RACK vs. REMX
RACK (VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while REMX is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RACK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.
Performance
RACK vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RACK
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REMX
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- YTD
- 22.66%
- 6M
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- 131.97%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
RACK vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF | -2.60% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | -8.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between RACK and REMX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RACK vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
RACK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
REMX
RACK vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RACK | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.68 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RACK vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RACK drawdown since its inception was -12.62%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RACK and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RACK | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.62% | -90.20% | +77.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -62.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -58.48% | +52.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -66.82% | +62.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.91% | — |
Volatility
RACK vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RACK | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.99% | 50.00% | +6.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.99% | 40.71% | +16.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.99% | 37.15% | +19.84% |
RACK vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RACK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
RACK vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
RACK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.43% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RACK and REMX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RACK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RACK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.
REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for RACK.
RACK is categorized as Technology Equities, while REMX is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. RACK tracks MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RACK and 0.59% for REMX.
Find the right allocation for RACK and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer