PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RACK vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RACK vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RACK

1D
-2.11%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MOAT

1D
0.88%
1M
3.57%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
-0.05%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RACK vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RACK and MOAT is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026

-1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RACK vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RACK

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RACK vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RACK vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RACKMOATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-5.75

0.78

-6.52

Drawdowns

RACK vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RACK drawdown since its inception was -2.16%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RACK and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RACKMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-33.31%

+31.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-3.88%

+1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.11%

-3.83%

+2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

Volatility

RACK vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RACKMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

13.85%

+9.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.03%

18.18%

+4.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.03%

18.68%

+4.35%

RACK vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RACK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

RACK vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

RACK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.36%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
RACK
VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RACK and MOAT have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RACK.

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.00% for RACK.

RACK is categorized as Technology Equities, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. RACK tracks MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RACK and 0.47% for MOAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RACK and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer