RACK vs. GTEK

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

RACK (VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF) and GTEK (Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. RACK is passively managed, while GTEK is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RACK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GTEK.

Performance

RACK vs. GTEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RACK

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -2.66%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GTEK

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: -2.07%
• 6M: 37.67%
• YTD: 43.93%
• 1Y: 61.00%
• 3Y*: 30.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RACK vs. GTEK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF	-7.65%
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	-5.35%

Correlation

The correlation between RACK and GTEK is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026	0.91

Return for Risk

RACK vs. GTEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RACK

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GTEK

GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 82
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 73
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RACK vs. GTEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RACK	GTEK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.06	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.61	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.51	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.03	—

Drawdowns

RACK vs. GTEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RACK drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, smaller than the maximum GTEK drawdown of -53.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RACK and GTEK.

Drawdown Indicators

	RACK	GTEK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.12%	-53.77%	+40.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.90%	-8.53%	-2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.62%	-26.98%	+20.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RACK	GTEK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	26.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.54%	29.70%	+21.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.54%	28.82%	+22.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.54%	28.82%	+22.72%

RACK vs. GTEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

RACK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GTEK's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RACK vs. GTEK - Dividend Comparison

Neither RACK nor GTEK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.26%	0.03%
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RACK and GTEK in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, RACK and GTEK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, RACK or GTEK?

On fees, RACK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RACK or GTEK?

RACK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RACK or GTEK?

RACK and GTEK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between RACK and GTEK?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RACK and 0.75% for GTEK.