RAAX vs. MDAA

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

RAAX (VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF) and MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RAAX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MDAA.

Performance

RAAX vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAAX achieves a 13.54% return, which is significantly lower than MDAA's 18.45% return.

RAAX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 0.74%
• 6M: 1.82%
• YTD: 13.54%
• 1Y: 27.13%
• 3Y*: 18.21%
• 5Y*: 13.05%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.86%

MDAA

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: 2.39%
• 6M: 9.08%
• YTD: 18.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	$2.21K	$4.58K	$40.10K
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF	$11.21M	$11.22M	$11.14M

RAAX vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF	13.54%	3.86%
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	18.45%	-0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between RAAX and MDAA is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

RAAX vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RAAX

RAAX Risk / Return Rank: 69
RAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
RAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
RAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

MDAA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RAAX vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RAAX	MDAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.26	—	—

Drawdowns

RAAX vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAAX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, which is greater than MDAA's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAX and MDAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RAAX	MDAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.91%	-14.59%	-19.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.12%	-4.09%	-3.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.78%	-3.53%	-3.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.29%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RAAX	MDAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.56%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.96%	24.57%	-9.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.69%	24.57%	-8.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.79%	24.57%	-8.78%

RAAX vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

RAAX vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison

RAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than MDAA's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	0.39%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF	2.06%	2.34%	1.91%	3.66%	1.53%	8.72%	6.27%	2.37%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RAAX and MDAA in my portfolio?

RAAX and MDAA have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RAAX or MDAA?

On fees, RAAX is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RAAX or MDAA?

RAAX is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MDAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RAAX or MDAA?

RAAX has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.39% for MDAA.

What is the main difference between RAAX and MDAA?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for RAAX and 0.97% for MDAA.