PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAAX vs. JNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAAX vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RAAX having a 17.64% return and JNJ slightly higher at 17.68%.


RAAX

1D
2.26%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
17.64%
6M
17.56%
1Y
32.08%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*

JNJ

1D
1.07%
1M
6.86%
YTD
17.68%
6M
15.11%
1Y
57.15%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAAX vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RAAX
VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF
17.64%26.74%12.50%6.71%1.51%21.56%-8.27%6.14%-2.41%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
17.68%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%11.44%10.82%16.22%1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between RAAX and JNJ is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2018

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAAX vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAAX
RAAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAAX vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RAAXJNJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.61

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.68

5.28

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.90

15.52

+1.38

RAAX vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAAX and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RAAX vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAAX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, smaller than the maximum JNJ drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAX and JNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAAXJNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.91%

-50.67%

+16.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-10.96%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.59%

-15.95%

+4.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-18.41%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.77%

-2.54%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-11.90%

+5.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

3.72%

-1.74%

Volatility

RAAX vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) is 4.67%, while Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that RAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAAXJNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

5.47%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.21%

12.16%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.18%

16.94%

-2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.70%

16.87%

-1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

18.48%

-2.69%

Dividends

RAAX vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

RAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than JNJ's 2.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.18%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%
RAAX
VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF
1.99%2.34%1.91%3.66%1.53%8.72%6.27%2.37%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAAX and JNJ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNJ has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to RAAX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAAX dropped -33.91% vs JNJ's -50.67%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAAX and JNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer