RAA vs. ETHD

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

RAA (SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF) and ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RAA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by SMI Advisory Services, while ETHD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RAA returned 15.83% vs -5.43% for ETHD. At a correlation of -0.59, they often move in opposite directions. RAA charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for ETHD.

Performance

RAA vs. ETHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAA achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than ETHD's 35.05% return.

RAA

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.98%
• 6M: 4.68%
• YTD: 7.20%
• 1Y: 15.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ETHD

• 1D: 3.61%
• 1M: -16.70%
• 6M: 70.75%
• YTD: 35.05%
• 1Y: -5.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAA vs. ETHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF	7.20%	11.92%
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF	35.05%	-81.59%

Correlation

The correlation between RAA and ETHD is -0.59, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	-0.59

The correlation between RAA and ETHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RAA vs. ETHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAA

RAA Risk / Return Rank: 61
RAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RAA Omega Ratio Rank: 58
RAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
RAA Martin Ratio Rank: 63

ETHD

ETHD Risk / Return Rank: 14
ETHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
ETHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
ETHD Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ETHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
ETHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAA vs. ETHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RAA	ETHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	-0.04	+1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	0.92	+1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.11	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	-0.10	+2.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.62	-0.15	+8.77

RAA vs. ETHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the ETHD Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAA and ETHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RAA vs. ETHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAA drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, smaller than the maximum ETHD drawdown of -95.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAA and ETHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	RAA	ETHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.96%	-95.59%	+83.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.91%	-57.19%	+51.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.85%	-89.45%	+85.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.59%	-67.08%	+65.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	37.70%	-35.86%

Volatility

RAA vs. ETHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) is 2.87%, while ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a volatility of 29.51%. This indicates that RAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RAA	ETHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	29.51%	-26.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.37%	93.59%	-85.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.32%	134.48%	-124.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.72%	141.37%	-128.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.72%	141.37%	-128.65%

RAA vs. ETHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHD's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

RAA vs. ETHD - Dividend Comparison

RAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than ETHD's 5.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF	5.51%	156.62%	19.15%
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF	2.14%	2.14%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RAA and ETHD in my portfolio?

RAA and ETHD have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RAA or ETHD?

ETHD has higher volatility (29.51%) compared to RAA (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAA dropped -11.96% vs ETHD's -95.59%.

Which ETF is better, RAA or ETHD?

On 1-year performance, RAA leads with 15.83% vs -5.43% for ETHD. On fees, RAA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, RAA has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RAA or ETHD?

Over the 1-year period, RAA has performed better with a 15.83% return vs -5.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RAA or ETHD?

RAA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RAA or ETHD?

ETHD has the higher dividend yield at 5.51%, compared with 2.14% for RAA.

What is the main difference between RAA and ETHD?

RAA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ETHD is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: SMI Advisory Services and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for RAA and 1.01% for ETHD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.