PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAA vs. EAOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RAA vs. EAOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) and iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RAA vs. EAOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAA achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than EAOK's -0.44% return.


RAA

1D
0.54%
1M
-3.48%
YTD
1.17%
6M
3.28%
1Y
17.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EAOK

1D
0.27%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
0.86%
1Y
9.22%
3Y*
7.39%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RAA vs. EAOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOK's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RAA vs. EAOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAA
RAA Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
RAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOK
EAOK Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EAOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOK Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOK Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAA vs. EAOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) and iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RAAEAOKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

1.42

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

2.07

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.13

-0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.55

8.42

+1.14

RAA vs. EAOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the EAOK Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAA and EAOK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAAEAOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.42

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.56

+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between RAA and EAOK is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

RAA vs. EAOK - Dividend Comparison

RAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than EAOK's 3.24% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
RAA
SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF
2.31%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EAOK
iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF
3.24%3.18%3.15%2.80%2.27%1.19%1.00%

Drawdowns

RAA vs. EAOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAA drawdown since its inception was -11.80%, smaller than the maximum EAOK drawdown of -19.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAA and EAOK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RAAEAOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.80%

-19.91%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

-4.49%

-4.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-2.83%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-5.15%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.14%

+0.74%

Volatility

RAA vs. EAOK - Volatility Comparison

SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) at 2.85%. This indicates that RAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RAAEAOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

2.85%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

4.02%

+3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.97%

6.51%

+6.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.18%

6.99%

+6.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.18%

6.83%

+6.35%