RA vs. ARDC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) and Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC).

RA is managed by Brookfield.

Performance

RA vs. ARDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) and Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RA vs. ARDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.	1.98%	8.32%	15.87%	-9.02%	-13.47%	32.35%	-4.17%	24.89%	-9.15%	15.99%
ARDC Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.	-6.14%	-3.10%	21.05%	32.35%	-22.21%	23.12%	2.56%	21.26%	-8.80%	17.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RA achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than ARDC's -6.14% return.

RA

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: -3.58%
• YTD: 1.98%
• 6M: 1.61%
• 1Y: 8.87%
• 3Y*: 3.37%
• 5Y*: 2.15%
• 10Y*: —

ARDC

• 1D: 2.70%
• 1M: -3.27%
• YTD: -6.14%
• 6M: -9.00%
• 1Y: -4.89%
• 3Y*: 11.17%
• 5Y*: 5.31%
• 10Y*: 8.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RA vs. ARDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RA

RA Risk / Return Rank: 36
RA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
RA Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
RA Omega Ratio Rank: 37
RA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
RA Martin Ratio Rank: 38

ARDC

ARDC Risk / Return Rank: 27
ARDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
ARDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
ARDC Omega Ratio Rank: 21
ARDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
ARDC Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RA vs. ARDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) and Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RA	ARDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	-0.34	+1.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	-0.34	+1.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.94	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	-0.31	+1.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.08	-0.77	+4.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RA vs. ARDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RA Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the ARDC Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RA and ARDC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RA	ARDC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	-0.34	+1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.39	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.34	-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between RA and ARDC is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RA vs. ARDC - Dividend Comparison

RA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.01%, which matches ARDC's 11.10% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.	11.01%	10.93%	10.63%	16.74%	14.79%	11.31%	13.39%	11.19%	12.52%	10.22%	0.89%	0.00%
ARDC Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.	11.10%	10.19%	9.33%	9.85%	10.31%	7.16%	8.40%	8.40%	9.35%	7.58%	8.45%	10.51%

Drawdowns

RA vs. ARDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RA drawdown since its inception was -50.66%, which is greater than ARDC's maximum drawdown of -45.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RA and ARDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RA	ARDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.66%	-45.40%	-5.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.58%	-15.57%	+7.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.83%	-26.48%	-4.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.50%	-13.29%	+8.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.18%	-6.60%	-1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	6.36%	-4.24%

Volatility

RA vs. ARDC - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) and Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC) have volatilities of 5.16% and 4.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RA	ARDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.16%	4.94%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.74%	7.42%	-0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.38%	14.48%	-3.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.91%	13.73%	+4.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.82%	16.85%	+3.97%