PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^SP400 vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^SP400 vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 400 Index (^SP400) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^SP400 vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^SP400
S&P 400 Index
3.02%5.90%12.20%14.45%-14.48%23.21%11.81%24.05%-12.50%14.45%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^SP400 achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ^SP400 has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 8.90%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


^SP400

1D
0.85%
1M
-5.55%
YTD
3.02%
6M
3.99%
1Y
15.98%
3Y*
10.67%
5Y*
5.16%
10Y*
8.90%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^SP400 vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^SP400
^SP400 Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
^SP400 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SP400 Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SP400 Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
^SP400 Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SP400 Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^SP400 vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 400 Index (^SP400) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^SP400^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.77

0.92

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

1.41

-0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.21

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

1.41

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.99

6.61

-1.63

^SP400 vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^SP400 Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^SP400 and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^SP400^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

0.92

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.61

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.68

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.46

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between ^SP400 and ^GSPC is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^SP400 vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^SP400 drawdown since its inception was -56.32%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SP400 and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^SP400^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.32%

-56.78%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.11%

-12.14%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

-25.43%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.14%

-33.92%

-8.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.60%

-5.78%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-10.75%

+3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

2.60%

+0.74%

Volatility

^SP400 vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

S&P 400 Index (^SP400) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that ^SP400's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^SP400^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

5.37%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.84%

9.55%

+2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.98%

18.33%

+2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.63%

16.90%

+2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

18.05%

+2.92%