R1VL.L vs. TDIV.L
R1VL.L (iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and TDIV.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - R1VL.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index, while TDIV.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, R1VL.L returned 17.50%/yr vs 22.34%/yr for TDIV.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. R1VL.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDIV.L.
Performance
R1VL.L vs. TDIV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, R1VL.L achieves a 18.22% return, which is significantly higher than TDIV.L's 11.84% return.
R1VL.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 14.29%
- YTD
- 18.22%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDIV.L
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- YTD
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 13.83%
R1VL.L vs. TDIV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1VL.L iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 18.22% | 16.01% | 13.45% | 6.43% |
TDIV.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 11.84% | 40.41% | 8.93% | 11.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between R1VL.L and TDIV.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.66 |
The correlation between R1VL.L and TDIV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
R1VL.L vs. TDIV.L — Risk / Return Rank
R1VL.L
TDIV.L
R1VL.L vs. TDIV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (R1VL.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TDIV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| R1VL.L | TDIV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.48 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.04 | 5.64 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.84 | 15.83 | +3.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
R1VL.L vs. TDIV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R1VL.L drawdown since its inception was -16.43%, smaller than the maximum TDIV.L drawdown of -37.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R1VL.L and TDIV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| R1VL.L | TDIV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.43% | -37.94% | +21.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.78% | -5.27% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.43% | -13.89% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.35% | -3.99% | +1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.88% | -0.33% |
Volatility
R1VL.L vs. TDIV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (R1VL.L) is 2.54%, while VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TDIV.L) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that R1VL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| R1VL.L | TDIV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 2.90% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.93% | 8.56% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.48% | 11.22% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.60% | 14.56% | -1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.60% | 16.20% | -3.60% |
R1VL.L vs. TDIV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
R1VL.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIV.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
R1VL.L vs. TDIV.L - Dividend Comparison
R1VL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDIV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1VL.L iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDIV.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.10% | 3.49% | 4.36% | 4.82% | 4.49% | 4.14% | 3.88% | 4.37% | 5.77% | 4.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
R1VL.L and TDIV.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, R1VL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
R1VL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDIV.L.
R1VL.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while TDIV.L is Global Equities. R1VL.L tracks Russell 1000 Value UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index, while TDIV.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for R1VL.L and 0.38% for TDIV.L.
Find the right allocation for R1VL.L and TDIV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer