R1VL.L vs. IESU.L
R1VL.L (iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IESU.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - R1VL.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index, while IESU.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, R1VL.L returned 17.50%/yr vs 14.63%/yr for IESU.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. R1VL.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IESU.L.
Performance
R1VL.L vs. IESU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
R1VL.L is traded in USD, while IESU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IESU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, R1VL.L achieves a 18.22% return, which is significantly lower than IESU.L's 28.54% return.
R1VL.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 14.29%
- YTD
- 18.22%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IESU.L
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 21.20%
- YTD
- 28.54%
- 1Y
- 36.33%
- 3Y*
- 14.63%
- 5Y*
- 22.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
R1VL.L vs. IESU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1VL.L iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 18.22% | 16.01% | 13.45% | 6.43% |
IESU.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 28.54% | 9.98% | 3.69% | 5.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between R1VL.L and IESU.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, the correlation between R1VL.L and IESU.L has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
R1VL.L vs. IESU.L — Risk / Return Rank
R1VL.L
IESU.L
R1VL.L vs. IESU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (R1VL.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| R1VL.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.26 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.04 | 2.21 | +2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.84 | 5.65 | +13.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
R1VL.L vs. IESU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R1VL.L drawdown since its inception was -16.43%, smaller than the maximum IESU.L drawdown of -72.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R1VL.L and IESU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| R1VL.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.43% | -72.57% | +56.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.78% | -16.37% | +10.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.43% | -22.55% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -8.87% | +8.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.35% | -24.88% | +22.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 6.42% | -4.87% |
Volatility
R1VL.L vs. IESU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (R1VL.L) is 2.54%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that R1VL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| R1VL.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 6.97% | -4.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.93% | 21.03% | -13.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.48% | 23.89% | -13.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.60% | 29.47% | -16.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.60% | 29.81% | -17.21% |
R1VL.L vs. IESU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
R1VL.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IESU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
R1VL.L vs. IESU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither R1VL.L nor IESU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
R1VL.L and IESU.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IESU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IESU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for R1VL.L.
R1VL.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IESU.L is Energy Equities. R1VL.L tracks Russell 1000 Value UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index, while IESU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for R1VL.L and 0.15% for IESU.L.
Find the right allocation for R1VL.L and IESU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer