R1GR.L vs. R1GB.L
R1GR.L (iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and R1GB.L (iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from iShares tracking the Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, R1GR.L returned 9.87% vs 12.54% for R1GB.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
R1GR.L vs. R1GB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
R1GR.L is traded in USD, while R1GB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the R1GB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, R1GR.L achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly lower than R1GB.L's 2.51% return.
R1GR.L
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 9.87%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
R1GB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 12.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
R1GR.L vs. R1GB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
R1GR.L iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.07% | 17.39% | 8.23% |
R1GB.L iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc | 2.51% | 17.73% | -15.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between R1GR.L and R1GB.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between R1GR.L and R1GB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
R1GR.L vs. R1GB.L — Risk / Return Rank
R1GR.L
R1GB.L
R1GR.L vs. R1GB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (R1GR.L) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (R1GB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| R1GR.L | R1GB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.14 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 0.81 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | 2.50 | -0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
R1GR.L vs. R1GB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R1GR.L drawdown since its inception was -23.18%, smaller than the maximum R1GB.L drawdown of -33.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R1GR.L and R1GB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| R1GR.L | R1GB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.18% | -33.80% | +10.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.74% | -15.56% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.48% | -5.12% | -2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -12.78% | +9.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.19% | 5.03% | +0.16% |
Volatility
R1GR.L vs. R1GB.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (R1GR.L) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (R1GB.L) have volatilities of 6.07% and 6.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| R1GR.L | R1GB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 6.21% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 12.52% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.73% | 16.48% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 24.52% | -6.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 24.52% | -6.44% |
R1GR.L vs. R1GB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both R1GR.L and R1GB.L have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
R1GR.L vs. R1GB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither R1GR.L nor R1GB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, R1GR.L and R1GB.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
R1GR.L and R1GB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index.
Find the right allocation for R1GR.L and R1GB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer