R1GB.L vs. FDNI.L
R1GB.L (iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc) and FDNI.L (First Trust Dow Jones International Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - R1GB.L is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index, while FDNI.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones International Internet Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, R1GB.L returned 12.02% vs -17.95% for FDNI.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. R1GB.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FDNI.L.
Performance
R1GB.L vs. FDNI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
R1GB.L is traded in GBP, while FDNI.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FDNI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, R1GB.L achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly higher than FDNI.L's -19.25% return.
R1GB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- 6M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 12.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDNI.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- 6M
- -20.02%
- YTD
- -19.25%
- 1Y
- -17.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.08%
- 5Y*
- -8.28%
- 10Y*
- —
R1GB.L vs. FDNI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
R1GB.L iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc | 2.35% | 9.47% | -13.92% |
FDNI.L First Trust Dow Jones International Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) | -19.25% | 17.62% | 19.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between R1GB.L and FDNI.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2024 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
R1GB.L vs. FDNI.L — Risk / Return Rank
R1GB.L
FDNI.L
R1GB.L vs. FDNI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (R1GB.L) and First Trust Dow Jones International Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FDNI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| R1GB.L | FDNI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.89 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | -0.46 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | -0.81 | +2.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
R1GB.L vs. FDNI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R1GB.L drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, smaller than the maximum FDNI.L drawdown of -64.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R1GB.L and FDNI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| R1GB.L | FDNI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.43% | -64.63% | +31.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.75% | -35.98% | +20.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.21% | -47.95% | +42.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.68% | -27.64% | +12.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.87% | 20.58% | -14.71% |
Volatility
R1GB.L vs. FDNI.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (R1GB.L) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to First Trust Dow Jones International Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FDNI.L) at 5.46%. This indicates that R1GB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDNI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| R1GB.L | FDNI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 5.46% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 17.15% | -5.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.98% | 21.67% | -5.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 33.25% | -8.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 2,375.51% | -2,351.13% |
R1GB.L vs. FDNI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
R1GB.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FDNI.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
R1GB.L vs. FDNI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither R1GB.L nor FDNI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
R1GB.L and FDNI.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, R1GB.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
R1GB.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FDNI.L.
R1GB.L is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FDNI.L is Technology Equities. R1GB.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index, while FDNI.L tracks Dow Jones International Internet Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for R1GB.L and 0.65% for FDNI.L.
Find the right allocation for R1GB.L and FDNI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer