QYLP.L vs. IDVY.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

QYLP.L (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP) and IDVY.L (iShares EURO Dividend UCITS) are both exchange-traded funds - QYLP.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite Index, while IDVY.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QYLP.L returned 11.49%/yr vs 21.00%/yr for IDVY.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QYLP.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IDVY.L.

Performance

QYLP.L vs. IDVY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L) and iShares EURO Dividend UCITS (IDVY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

QYLP.L is traded in GBP, while IDVY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IDVY.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLP.L achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly lower than IDVY.L's 9.60% return.

QYLP.L

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -0.01%
• 6M: 6.81%
• YTD: 7.80%
• 1Y: 19.18%
• 3Y*: 11.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IDVY.L

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 0.13%
• 6M: 8.94%
• YTD: 9.60%
• 1Y: 21.35%
• 3Y*: 21.00%
• 5Y*: 10.11%
• 10Y*: 8.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLP.L vs. IDVY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QYLP.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP	7.80%	-1.78%	24.51%	16.58%	-18.75%
IDVY.L iShares EURO Dividend UCITS	9.60%	48.82%	3.38%	2.07%	0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLP.L and IDVY.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022	0.17

QYLP.L vs. IDVY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QYLP.L	IDVY.L
Technology	20.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	17.2%	7.9%
Industrials	16.0%	16.4%
Financial Services	14.8%	50.3%
Healthcare	10.2%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	8.4%	4.0%
Communication Services	7.4%	5.7%
Real Estate	3.5%	-
Utilities	1.5%	8.3%
Energy	0.2%	4.6%
Basic Materials	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QYLP.L vs. IDVY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLP.L

QYLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
QYLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
QYLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
QYLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QYLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QYLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 89

IDVY.L

IDVY.L Risk / Return Rank: 63
IDVY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
IDVY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
IDVY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
IDVY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
IDVY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLP.L vs. IDVY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L) and iShares EURO Dividend UCITS (IDVY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QYLP.L	IDVY.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	1.77	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	2.42	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.33	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.27	2.37	+2.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.61	8.01	+7.61

QYLP.L vs. IDVY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the IDVY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLP.L and IDVY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QYLP.L vs. IDVY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLP.L drawdown since its inception was -21.90%, smaller than the maximum IDVY.L drawdown of -74.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLP.L and IDVY.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	QYLP.L	IDVY.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.90%	-74.07%	+52.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.62%	-8.95%	+5.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.90%	-10.50%	-11.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.98%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.17%	-0.65%	-1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.38%	-33.84%	+26.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.23%	2.66%	-1.43%

Volatility

QYLP.L vs. IDVY.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to iShares EURO Dividend UCITS (IDVY.L) at 3.22%. This indicates that QYLP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDVY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QYLP.L	IDVY.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.86%	3.22%	+1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.03%	9.61%	-1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.65%	12.00%	-2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.06%	15.36%	-0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.06%	17.31%	-2.25%

QYLP.L vs. IDVY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLP.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IDVY.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

QYLP.L vs. IDVY.L - Dividend Comparison

QYLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, more than IDVY.L's 4.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDVY.L iShares EURO Dividend UCITS	4.51%	4.28%	5.94%	5.75%	5.08%	3.76%	3.59%	5.03%	4.68%	3.85%	3.69%	3.93%
QYLP.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP	11.54%	11.71%	10.64%	10.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QYLP.L and IDVY.L in my portfolio?

QYLP.L and IDVY.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QYLP.L or IDVY.L?

On fees, IDVY.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QYLP.L or IDVY.L?

IDVY.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QYLP.L.

What is the main difference between QYLP.L and IDVY.L?

QYLP.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IDVY.L is Europe Equities. QYLP.L tracks Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite Index, while IDVY.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QYLP.L and 0.40% for IDVY.L.