PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QYLG vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QYLG vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLG achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return.


QYLG

1D
-0.05%
1M
6.22%
YTD
14.75%
6M
14.78%
1Y
32.88%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
13.19%
10Y*

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLG vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
14.75%15.29%22.02%38.73%-26.27%18.29%12.52%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%13.68%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLG and SPY is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2020

0.89

The correlation between QYLG and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

QYLG vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QYLG
SPY

Technology

53.7%
35.9%

Communication Services

15.8%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.8%

Healthcare

4.2%
8.4%

Industrials

2.9%
7.8%

Utilities

1.4%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.8%

Energy

0.6%
3.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.8%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Technology

QYLG
53.7%
SPY
35.9%

Communication Services

QYLG
15.8%
SPY
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QYLG
12.3%
SPY
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

QYLG
7.7%
SPY
4.8%

Healthcare

QYLG
4.2%
SPY
8.4%

Industrials

QYLG
2.9%
SPY
7.8%

Utilities

QYLG
1.4%
SPY
2.4%

Basic Materials

QYLG
1.1%
SPY
1.8%

Energy

QYLG
0.6%
SPY
3.6%

Financial Services

QYLG
0.2%
SPY
11.8%

Real Estate

QYLG
0.1%
SPY
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QYLG vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLG
QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLG vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QYLGSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.72

2.38

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.68

3.24

+0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.43

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

3.16

+0.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.87

14.72

+3.16

QYLG vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLG and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QYLGSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

2.38

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.82

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.59

+0.24

Drawdowns

QYLG vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLG drawdown since its inception was -29.98%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLG and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QYLGSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.98%

-55.19%

+25.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.42%

-8.88%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.75%

-18.76%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.98%

-24.50%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.70%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.42%

-9.05%

+2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

1.91%

-0.07%

Volatility

QYLG vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that QYLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QYLGSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

2.84%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

8.90%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

11.83%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.98%

17.05%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.93%

17.94%

-0.01%

QYLG vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

QYLG vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

QYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.08%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
16.08%17.93%25.27%5.43%6.91%10.15%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, QYLG and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QYLG has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLG dropped -29.98% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.83% vs 13.19% for QYLG. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.83% return vs 13.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLG.

QYLG has the higher dividend yield at 16.08%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.

QYLG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPY is S&P 500. QYLG tracks CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLG and 0.09% for SPY.

QYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QYLG and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer