QYLG vs. RYLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG).
QYLG and RYLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. It was launched on Sep 18, 2020. RYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2022. Both QYLG and RYLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QYLG vs. RYLG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QYLG vs. RYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF | -2.27% | 15.29% | 22.02% | 38.73% | -2.65% |
RYLG Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 1.14% | 9.39% | 10.57% | 8.33% | -1.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLG achieves a -2.27% return, which is significantly lower than RYLG's 1.14% return.
QYLG
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- YTD
- -2.27%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 20.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- —
RYLG
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- 1Y
- 18.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QYLG vs. RYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QYLG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QYLG vs. RYLG — Risk / Return Rank
QYLG
RYLG
QYLG vs. RYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QYLG | RYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.97 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 1.47 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.21 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 1.43 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | 6.45 | +2.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QYLG | RYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.97 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.46 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLG and RYLG is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QYLG vs. RYLG - Dividend Comparison
QYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.82%, more than RYLG's 11.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 18.82% | 17.93% | 25.27% | 5.43% | 6.91% | 10.15% | 1.44% |
RYLG Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 11.30% | 10.82% | 23.73% | 5.78% | 4.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QYLG vs. RYLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLG drawdown since its inception was -29.98%, which is greater than RYLG's maximum drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLG and RYLG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLG | RYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.98% | -22.37% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.45% | -13.18% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.76% | -5.28% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.60% | -4.29% | -2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 2.92% | -0.59% |
Volatility
QYLG vs. RYLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) is 5.88%, while Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that QYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QYLG | RYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.88% | 6.30% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.16% | 11.99% | -1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.87% | 19.62% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 17.35% | +0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 17.35% | +0.74% |