QYLG vs. COPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QYLG (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QYLG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QYLG returned 13.19%/yr vs 19.87%/yr for COPX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QYLG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.

Performance

QYLG vs. COPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLG achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 25.71% return.

QYLG

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 6.22%
• YTD: 14.75%
• 6M: 14.78%
• 1Y: 32.88%
• 3Y*: 21.40%
• 5Y*: 13.19%
• 10Y*: —

COPX

• 1D: -3.64%
• 1M: 17.74%
• YTD: 25.71%
• 6M: 36.90%
• 1Y: 120.82%
• 3Y*: 37.36%
• 5Y*: 19.87%
• 10Y*: 21.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLG vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	14.75%	15.29%	22.02%	38.73%	-26.27%	18.29%	12.52%
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF	25.71%	93.50%	3.57%	8.38%	-0.76%	23.39%	43.54%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLG and COPX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2020	0.43

The correlation between QYLG and COPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QYLG vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QYLG	COPX
Technology	53.7%	-
Communication Services	15.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Industrials	2.9%	3.7%
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	96.3%
Energy	0.6%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QYLG vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLG

QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 81
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 81
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 85

COPX

COPX Risk / Return Rank: 75
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLG vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QYLG	COPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	2.93	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	3.17	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.42	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	4.37	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.87	14.00	+3.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QYLG vs. COPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the COPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLG and COPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QYLG	COPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.72	2.93	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.55	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.19	+0.64

Drawdowns

QYLG vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLG drawdown since its inception was -29.98%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLG and COPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QYLG	COPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.98%	-83.16%	+53.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.42%	-27.82%	+19.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.75%	-39.72%	+18.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.98%	-42.12%	+12.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-65.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	-5.69%	+5.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.42%	-39.30%	+32.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	8.66%	-6.82%

Volatility

QYLG vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) is 3.10%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that QYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QYLG	COPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	15.38%	-12.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.68%	35.68%	-26.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.17%	41.41%	-29.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.98%	36.51%	-18.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.93%	35.55%	-17.62%

QYLG vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

QYLG vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison

QYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.08%, more than COPX's 2.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF	2.13%	2.68%	1.80%	2.39%	3.14%	1.48%	1.30%	1.37%	2.59%	1.57%	0.60%	1.20%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	16.08%	17.93%	25.27%	5.43%	6.91%	10.15%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QYLG and COPX in my portfolio?

QYLG and COPX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QYLG or COPX?

COPX has higher volatility (15.38%) compared to QYLG (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLG dropped -29.98% vs COPX's -83.16%.

Which ETF is better, QYLG or COPX?

On 5-year performance, COPX leads with 19.87% vs 13.19% for QYLG. On fees, QYLG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QYLG or COPX?

Over the 5-year period, COPX has performed better with a 19.87% return vs 13.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QYLG or COPX?

QYLG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QYLG or COPX?

QYLG has the higher dividend yield at 16.08%, compared with 2.13% for COPX.

What is the main difference between QYLG and COPX?

QYLG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while COPX is Materials. QYLG tracks CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLG and 0.65% for COPX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.