QYLE vs. CRSH
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH).
QYLE and CRSH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QYLE is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 ESG BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Feb 21, 2023. CRSH is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on May 1, 2024.
Performance
QYLE vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QYLE vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QYLE Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF | 0.00% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 9.12% |
Returns By Period
QYLE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRSH
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 18.37%
- 6M
- 24.09%
- 1Y
- -24.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QYLE vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QYLE has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QYLE vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
QYLE
CRSH
QYLE vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QYLE | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.64 | — |
Dividends
QYLE vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
QYLE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 100.61%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QYLE Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 100.61% | 138.78% | 94.25% |
Drawdowns
QYLE vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLE drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CRSH drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLE and CRSH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLE | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -63.68% | +63.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -48.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -53.43% | +53.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -41.91% | +41.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 35.23% | — |
Volatility
QYLE vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QYLE | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 42.40% | -42.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 48.37% | -48.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 48.37% | -48.37% |