PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QYLD vs. KHPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QYLD vs. KHPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QYLD vs. KHPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
0.61%9.28%8.71%
KHPI
Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF
-3.02%11.14%4.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly higher than KHPI's -3.02% return.


QYLD

1D
0.58%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
0.61%
6M
7.46%
1Y
16.36%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
8.96%

KHPI

1D
0.50%
1M
-4.24%
YTD
-3.02%
6M
-0.73%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QYLD vs. KHPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KHPI's 0.96% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QYLD vs. KHPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

KHPI
KHPI Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
KHPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KHPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
KHPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
KHPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
KHPI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLD vs. KHPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QYLDKHPIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

0.97

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.61

1.46

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.22

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

1.70

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.32

7.46

+2.86

QYLD vs. KHPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the KHPI Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and KHPI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QYLDKHPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

0.97

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.80

-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and KHPI is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QYLD vs. KHPI - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%, more than KHPI's 9.39% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.85%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
KHPI
Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF
9.39%8.90%3.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. KHPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than KHPI's maximum drawdown of -10.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and KHPI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QYLDKHPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-10.58%

-14.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

-6.55%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-4.71%

+2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.89%

-1.28%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.49%

+0.16%

Volatility

QYLD vs. KHPI - Volatility Comparison

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI) at 3.26%. This indicates that QYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KHPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QYLDKHPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

3.26%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.50%

5.28%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

10.97%

+5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

9.78%

+5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

9.78%

+5.73%