QYLD vs. IVVW
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW).
QYLD and IVVW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013. IVVW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Enhanced 1% OTM BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Mar 14, 2024. Both QYLD and IVVW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QYLD vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QYLD vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 0.61% | 9.28% | 13.83% |
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | -1.13% | 11.71% | 12.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly higher than IVVW's -1.13% return.
QYLD
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
IVVW
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 4.20%
- 1Y
- 13.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QYLD vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QYLD vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank
QYLD
IVVW
QYLD vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QYLD | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.89 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 1.41 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 1.27 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 7.59 | +2.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QYLD | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.89 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.88 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLD and IVVW is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QYLD vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison
QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%, less than IVVW's 19.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.85% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 19.78% | 18.55% | 13.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QYLD vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than IVVW's maximum drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and IVVW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLD | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.75% | -16.79% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -11.21% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -2.90% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -1.87% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 1.88% | -0.23% |
Volatility
QYLD vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) at 4.54%. This indicates that QYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QYLD | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 4.54% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.50% | 6.63% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.43% | 15.56% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 13.10% | +1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 13.10% | +2.41% |