QYLD.L vs. WRDA.L
QYLD.L (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF) and WRDA.L (UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Global Equities funds - QYLD.L tracks the Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF while WRDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QYLD.L returned 19.10% vs 22.07% for WRDA.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
QYLD.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QYLD.L is traded in USD, while WRDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WRDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLD.L achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly lower than WRDA.L's 10.11% return.
QYLD.L
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WRDA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- YTD
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QYLD.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF | 7.25% | 5.36% | 22.29% |
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.11% | 21.28% | 17.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLD.L and WRDA.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between QYLD.L and WRDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QYLD.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
QYLD.L
WRDA.L
QYLD.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF (QYLD.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QYLD.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.34 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 0.80 | +3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.18 | 1.20 | +16.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QYLD.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLD.L drawdown since its inception was -21.59%, smaller than the maximum WRDA.L drawdown of -27.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD.L and WRDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLD.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.59% | -27.71% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.68% | -27.71% | +23.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -15.53% | +14.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.76% | -7.46% | +4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 18.35% | -17.31% |
Volatility
QYLD.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF (QYLD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) at 2.96%. This indicates that QYLD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QYLD.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 2.96% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | 9.04% | -0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.73% | 43.30% | -33.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 29.74% | -13.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 29.74% | -13.49% |
Dividends
QYLD.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison
QYLD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.57%, while WRDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF | 11.57% | 11.41% | 12.28% | 10.88% |
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QYLD.L and WRDA.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QYLD.L tracks Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and UBS.
Find the right allocation for QYLD.L and WRDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer