PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QYLD.L vs. BOTG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QYLD.L vs. BOTG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF (QYLD.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QYLD.L is traded in USD, while BOTG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BOTG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD.L achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly higher than BOTG.L's -1.66% return.


QYLD.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
-0.10%
6M
6.26%
YTD
7.25%
1Y
19.10%
3Y*
12.76%
5Y*
10Y*

BOTG.L

1D
0.33%
1M
-5.36%
6M
-5.21%
YTD
-1.66%
1Y
11.09%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLD.L vs. BOTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QYLD.L
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF
7.25%5.36%24.77%23.25%-2.11%
BOTG.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing
-1.66%13.42%13.09%39.59%-1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD.L and BOTG.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022

0.51

The correlation between QYLD.L and BOTG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QYLD.L vs. BOTG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD.L
QYLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QYLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTG.L
BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLD.L vs. BOTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF (QYLD.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QYLD.LBOTG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.09

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

0.60

+3.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.18

1.45

+16.74

QYLD.L vs. BOTG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD.L and BOTG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QYLD.L vs. BOTG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD.L drawdown since its inception was -21.59%, smaller than the maximum BOTG.L drawdown of -65.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD.L and BOTG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QYLD.LBOTG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.59%

-65.02%

+43.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.68%

-18.35%

+13.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.59%

-28.56%

+6.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-29.11%

+27.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-41.83%

+39.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

7.66%

-6.62%

Volatility

QYLD.L vs. BOTG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF (QYLD.L) is 4.59%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that QYLD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QYLD.LBOTG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

9.50%

-4.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

23.20%

-15.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.73%

27.83%

-18.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

31.29%

-15.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

31.29%

-15.04%

Dividends

QYLD.L vs. BOTG.L - Dividend Comparison

QYLD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.57%, more than BOTG.L's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BOTG.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing
0.33%0.27%0.24%0.08%
QYLD.L
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF
11.57%11.41%12.28%10.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


QYLD.L and BOTG.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QYLD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while BOTG.L is Robotics. QYLD.L tracks Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF, while BOTG.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QYLD.L and BOTG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer