QXQ vs. QQQA
QXQ (SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF) and QQQA (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QXQ is actively managed, while QQQA is passively managed. Over the past year, QXQ returned 31.41% vs 69.14% for QQQA. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QXQ charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QQQA.
Performance
QXQ vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QXQ achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 52.29% return.
QXQ
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 14.73%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQA
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -6.92%
- 6M
- 44.24%
- YTD
- 52.29%
- 1Y
- 69.14%
- 3Y*
- 28.26%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- —
QXQ vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QXQ SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF | 16.79% | 19.78% | 9.70% |
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 52.29% | 9.87% | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between QXQ and QQQA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between QXQ and QQQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
QXQ vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QXQ
QQQA
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QXQ
QQQA
Communication Services
QXQ
QQQA
Consumer Cyclical
QXQ
QQQA
Consumer Defensive
QXQ
QQQA
-
Healthcare
QXQ
QQQA
Industrials
QXQ
QQQA
-
Utilities
QXQ
QQQA
-
Basic Materials
QXQ
QQQA
-
Energy
QXQ
QQQA
Financial Services
QXQ
QQQA
-
Real Estate
QXQ
QQQA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QXQ vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank
QXQ
QQQA
QXQ vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF (QXQ) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QXQ | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 4.77 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.57 | 14.65 | -5.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QXQ vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QXQ drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum QQQA drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QXQ and QQQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QXQ | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.53% | -38.44% | +15.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | -14.58% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -12.96% | +9.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -15.48% | +11.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 4.74% | -1.45% |
Volatility
QXQ vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF (QXQ) is 7.70%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 16.98%. This indicates that QXQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QXQ | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 16.98% | -9.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 29.58% | -14.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.34% | 32.85% | -14.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.17% | 27.32% | -5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.17% | 27.02% | -4.85% |
QXQ vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QXQ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
QXQ vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison
QXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.35%, more than QQQA's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.02% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.10% |
QXQ SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF | 15.35% | 18.21% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QXQ and QQQA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQA has higher volatility (16.98%) compared to QXQ (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QXQ dropped -22.53% vs QQQA's -38.44%.
On 1-year performance, QQQA leads with 69.14% vs 31.41% for QXQ. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QXQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 69.14% return vs 31.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for QXQ.
QXQ has the higher dividend yield at 15.35%, compared with 0.02% for QQQA.
They also come from different issuers: Summit Global Investments and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for QXQ and 0.58% for QQQA.
QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QXQ and QQQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer