PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QXO vs. POET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QXO vs. POET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QXO, Inc (QXO) and POET Technologies Inc (POET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QXO achieves a -19.44% return, which is significantly lower than POET's 94.00% return. Over the past 10 years, QXO has outperformed POET with an annualized return of 7.76%, while POET has yielded a comparatively lower 5.63% annualized return.


QXO

1D
-1.40%
1M
-17.16%
YTD
-19.44%
6M
-26.94%
1Y
-18.21%
3Y*
-7.59%
5Y*
-19.91%
10Y*
7.76%

POET

1D
3.54%
1M
12.15%
YTD
94.00%
6M
97.11%
1Y
193.08%
3Y*
34.92%
5Y*
5.05%
10Y*
5.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QXO vs. POET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QXO
QXO, Inc
-19.44%21.32%-86.06%508.46%-33.78%63.72%-17.22%92.05%-45.15%43.66%
POET
POET Technologies Inc
94.00%6.39%536.09%-69.03%-57.46%9.79%130.96%38.41%19.00%-29.75%

Correlation

The correlation between QXO and POET is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.09

The correlation between QXO and POET shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

QXO:

-$1.03

POET:

-$1.11

PS Ratio

QXO:

0.91

POET:

650.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

QXO:

$8.56B

POET:

$1.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

QXO:

$1.98B

POET:

$182.16K

EBITDA (TTM)

QXO:

-$152.95M

POET:

-$59.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QXO vs. POET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QXO
QXO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
QXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
QXO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
QXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
QXO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

POET
POET Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
POET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POET Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
POET Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
POET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
POET Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QXO vs. POET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QXO, Inc (QXO) and POET Technologies Inc (POET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QXOPOETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.33

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

3.45

-3.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.90

6.62

-7.52

QXO vs. POET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QXO Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the POET Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QXO and POET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QXOPOETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

1.39

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.05

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

0.06

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.07

-0.02

Drawdowns

QXO vs. POET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QXO drawdown since its inception was -95.44%, roughly equal to the maximum POET drawdown of -93.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QXO and POET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QXOPOETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.44%

-93.47%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.59%

-56.29%

+13.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.44%

-85.85%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.44%

-93.47%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.44%

-93.47%

-1.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.40%

-40.30%

-53.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.37%

-61.10%

+4.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.33%

29.30%

-8.97%

Volatility

QXO vs. POET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for QXO, Inc (QXO) is 14.68%, while POET Technologies Inc (POET) has a volatility of 66.01%. This indicates that QXO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QXOPOETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.68%

66.01%

-51.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.00%

121.88%

-75.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.69%

139.98%

-81.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.36%

107.21%

+38.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

123.58%

99.13%

+24.45%

Dividends

QXO vs. POET - Dividend Comparison

Neither QXO nor POET has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
POET
POET Technologies Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QXO
QXO, Inc
0.00%0.00%164.53%1.17%0.00%13.42%31.47%1.15%0.00%1.89%2.00%

Financials

QXO vs. POET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QXO, Inc and POET Technologies Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.73B
341.20K
(QXO) Total Revenue
(POET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


QXO and POET have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POET has higher volatility (66.01%) compared to QXO (14.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QXO dropped -95.44% vs POET's -93.47%.

POET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QXO and POET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer