PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QXM.TO achieves a 5.90% return, which is significantly lower than PDC.TO's 26.09% return. Over the past 10 years, QXM.TO has underperformed PDC.TO with an annualized return of 10.22%, while PDC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.


QXM.TO

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.52%
6M
2.20%
YTD
5.90%
1Y
19.12%
3Y*
16.32%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
10.22%
ALL TIME*
12.05%

PDC.TO

1D
0.69%
1M
3.43%
6M
22.60%
YTD
26.09%
1Y
38.58%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
14.82%
10Y*
11.35%
ALL TIME*
10.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$76.46KCA$67.75KCA$95.06K
CA$10.54KCA$11.00KCA$13.52K

QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QXM.TO
CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF
5.90%23.46%20.08%13.24%-6.91%16.60%1.63%24.81%-9.15%15.66%
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF
26.09%21.80%16.38%6.97%-4.17%30.14%-5.48%25.00%-11.85%10.27%

Correlation

The correlation between QXM.TO and PDC.TO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2012

0.47

The correlation between QXM.TO and PDC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.52 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QXM.TO
PDC.TO

Industrials

31.3%
1.1%

Financial Services

16.8%
45.6%

Consumer Defensive

13.3%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
6.7%

Basic Materials

10.4%
3.7%

Communication Services

8.6%
4.4%

Technology

5.5%
0.7%

Utilities

1.2%
14.2%

Healthcare

0.8%

-

Real Estate

0.2%
2.4%

Energy

-

20.4%

Industrials

QXM.TO
31.3%
PDC.TO
1.1%

Financial Services

QXM.TO
16.8%
PDC.TO
45.6%

Consumer Defensive

QXM.TO
13.3%
PDC.TO
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QXM.TO
11.9%
PDC.TO
6.7%

Basic Materials

QXM.TO
10.4%
PDC.TO
3.7%

Communication Services

QXM.TO
8.6%
PDC.TO
4.4%

Technology

QXM.TO
5.5%
PDC.TO
0.7%

Utilities

QXM.TO
1.2%
PDC.TO
14.2%

Healthcare

QXM.TO
0.8%
PDC.TO

-

Real Estate

QXM.TO
0.2%
PDC.TO
2.4%

Energy

QXM.TO

-

PDC.TO
20.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QXM.TO
QXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PDC.TO
PDC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QXM.TOPDC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.89

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

10.03

-7.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.53

36.85

-29.32

QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QXM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QXM.TO and PDC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.65%, roughly equal to the maximum PDC.TO drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QXM.TO and PDC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QXM.TOPDC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.65%

-41.93%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-3.86%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.72%

-10.52%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.01%

-17.98%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.65%

-41.93%

+1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-0.33%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-4.48%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

1.05%

+1.50%

Volatility

QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) at 2.41%. This indicates that QXM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QXM.TOPDC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

2.41%

+3.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

6.51%

+5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

8.58%

+5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.00%

10.83%

+3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

15.28%

+0.44%

QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QXM.TO has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than PDC.TO's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Dividend Comparison

QXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than PDC.TO's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF
3.14%3.96%4.48%4.77%4.24%3.65%5.07%4.33%5.12%4.23%3.77%4.39%
QXM.TO
CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF
1.01%1.17%1.27%1.39%1.51%1.02%1.27%1.39%1.65%1.36%1.56%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


QXM.TO and PDC.TO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QXM.TO is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QXM.TO is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDC.TO.

QXM.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while PDC.TO is Dividend. QXM.TO tracks Morningstar National Bank Québec Index, while PDC.TO tracks NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QXM.TO and 0.58% for PDC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QXM.TO and PDC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer