QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO
QXM.TO (CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF) and PDC.TO (Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QXM.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar National Bank Québec Index, while PDC.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QXM.TO returned 10.22%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for PDC.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QXM.TO charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDC.TO.
Performance
QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QXM.TO achieves a 5.90% return, which is significantly lower than PDC.TO's 26.09% return. Over the past 10 years, QXM.TO has underperformed PDC.TO with an annualized return of 10.22%, while PDC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.
QXM.TO
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 19.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.05%
PDC.TO
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 22.60%
- YTD
- 26.09%
- 1Y
- 38.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$76.46K | CA$67.75K | CA$95.06K | |
| CA$10.54K | CA$11.00K | CA$13.52K |
QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QXM.TO CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF | 5.90% | 23.46% | 20.08% | 13.24% | -6.91% | 16.60% | 1.63% | 24.81% | -9.15% | 15.66% |
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 26.09% | 21.80% | 16.38% | 6.97% | -4.17% | 30.14% | -5.48% | 25.00% | -11.85% | 10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QXM.TO and PDC.TO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2012 | 0.47 |
The correlation between QXM.TO and PDC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.52 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QXM.TO
PDC.TO
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
Energy
-
Industrials
QXM.TO
PDC.TO
Financial Services
QXM.TO
PDC.TO
Consumer Defensive
QXM.TO
PDC.TO
Consumer Cyclical
QXM.TO
PDC.TO
Basic Materials
QXM.TO
PDC.TO
Communication Services
QXM.TO
PDC.TO
Technology
QXM.TO
PDC.TO
Utilities
QXM.TO
PDC.TO
Healthcare
QXM.TO
PDC.TO
-
Real Estate
QXM.TO
PDC.TO
Energy
QXM.TO
-
PDC.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QXM.TO
PDC.TO
QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QXM.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.89 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 10.03 | -7.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.53 | 36.85 | -29.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.65%, roughly equal to the maximum PDC.TO drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QXM.TO and PDC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QXM.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.65% | -41.93% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -3.86% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.72% | -10.52% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.01% | -17.98% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.65% | -41.93% | +1.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -0.33% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -4.48% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 1.05% | +1.50% |
Volatility
QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) at 2.41%. This indicates that QXM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QXM.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 2.41% | +3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 6.51% | +5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.99% | 8.58% | +5.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 10.83% | +3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 15.28% | +0.44% |
QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QXM.TO has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than PDC.TO's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
QXM.TO vs. PDC.TO - Dividend Comparison
QXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than PDC.TO's 3.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 3.14% | 3.96% | 4.48% | 4.77% | 4.24% | 3.65% | 5.07% | 4.33% | 5.12% | 4.23% | 3.77% | 4.39% |
QXM.TO CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.51% | 1.02% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 1.56% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QXM.TO and PDC.TO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QXM.TO is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QXM.TO is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDC.TO.
QXM.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while PDC.TO is Dividend. QXM.TO tracks Morningstar National Bank Québec Index, while PDC.TO tracks NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QXM.TO and 0.58% for PDC.TO.
Find the right allocation for QXM.TO and PDC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer