PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QXM.TO vs. HAL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QXM.TO vs. HAL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) and Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QXM.TO achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than HAL.TO's 23.33% return. Over the past 10 years, QXM.TO has underperformed HAL.TO with an annualized return of 10.29%, while HAL.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.


QXM.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.17%
6M
2.02%
YTD
5.72%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
10.29%

HAL.TO

1D
0.43%
1M
4.13%
6M
19.24%
YTD
23.33%
1Y
47.01%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
15.89%
10Y*
12.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QXM.TO vs. HAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QXM.TO
CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF
5.72%23.46%20.08%13.24%-6.91%16.60%1.63%24.81%-9.15%15.66%
HAL.TO
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF
23.33%24.60%21.69%-0.73%3.43%21.17%-2.63%22.29%-3.89%7.26%

Correlation

The correlation between QXM.TO and HAL.TO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2012

0.38

The correlation between QXM.TO and HAL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QXM.TO vs. HAL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QXM.TO
HAL.TO

Industrials

32.6%
15.0%

Financial Services

17.3%
25.7%

Consumer Defensive

12.4%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
1.8%

Basic Materials

10.2%
13.9%

Communication Services

8.5%

-

Technology

5.2%

-

Utilities

1.2%
12.6%

Healthcare

0.9%

-

Real Estate

0.2%
3.2%

Energy

-

23.9%

Industrials

QXM.TO
32.6%
HAL.TO
15.0%

Financial Services

QXM.TO
17.3%
HAL.TO
25.7%

Consumer Defensive

QXM.TO
12.4%
HAL.TO
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QXM.TO
11.6%
HAL.TO
1.8%

Basic Materials

QXM.TO
10.2%
HAL.TO
13.9%

Communication Services

QXM.TO
8.5%
HAL.TO

-

Technology

QXM.TO
5.2%
HAL.TO

-

Utilities

QXM.TO
1.2%
HAL.TO
12.6%

Healthcare

QXM.TO
0.9%
HAL.TO

-

Real Estate

QXM.TO
0.2%
HAL.TO
3.2%

Energy

QXM.TO

-

HAL.TO
23.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QXM.TO vs. HAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QXM.TO
QXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

HAL.TO
HAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
HAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QXM.TO vs. HAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) and Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QXM.TOHAL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.99

-0.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

9.18

-7.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.97

41.38

-33.41

QXM.TO vs. HAL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QXM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the HAL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QXM.TO and HAL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QXM.TO vs. HAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.65%, roughly equal to the maximum HAL.TO drawdown of -39.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QXM.TO and HAL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QXM.TOHAL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.65%

-39.70%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-5.15%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.72%

-12.44%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.01%

-16.43%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.65%

-39.70%

-0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

0.00%

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-4.73%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

1.14%

+1.41%

Volatility

QXM.TO vs. HAL.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO) at 2.29%. This indicates that QXM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QXM.TOHAL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

2.29%

+3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

8.20%

+4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

9.93%

+3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.01%

12.38%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.71%

17.67%

-1.96%

Dividends

QXM.TO vs. HAL.TO - Dividend Comparison

QXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than HAL.TO's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAL.TO
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF
1.85%2.37%2.79%3.60%4.84%2.99%3.57%3.03%3.50%3.32%2.99%3.62%
QXM.TO
CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF
1.01%1.17%1.27%1.39%1.51%1.02%1.27%1.39%1.65%1.36%1.56%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


QXM.TO and HAL.TO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: CI and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QXM.TO and HAL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer