PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QXM.TO vs. TLV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QXM.TO vs. TLV.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

QXM.TO (CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF) and TLV.TO (Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, QXM.TO returned 10.71%/yr vs 9.24%/yr for TLV.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

QXM.TO vs. TLV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) and Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QXM.TO achieves a 6.00% return, which is significantly lower than TLV.TO's 16.11% return. Over the past 10 years, QXM.TO has outperformed TLV.TO with an annualized return of 10.71%, while TLV.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.24% annualized return.

QXM.TO

1D
-1.03%
1M
2.42%
YTD
6.00%
6M
5.73%
1Y
24.00%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*
10.71%

TLV.TO

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
16.11%
6M
16.11%
1Y
28.97%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
9.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QXM.TO vs. TLV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QXM.TO
CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF		6.00%23.46%20.08%13.24%-6.91%16.60%1.63%24.81%-9.15%15.66%
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF		16.11%22.51%20.36%4.75%-10.22%21.67%-6.10%22.29%-6.62%10.15%

Correlation

The correlation between QXM.TO and TLV.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2012

0.47

The correlation between QXM.TO and TLV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF

Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF

Often compared with TLV.TO:
TLV.TO vs. ESG.TOTLV.TO vs. XEI.TOTLV.TO vs. FCCV.TOTLV.TO vs. ZLB.TOTLV.TO vs. QQCE.TOTLV.TO vs. XCS.TOTLV.TO vs. XDV.TO

Return for Risk

QXM.TO vs. TLV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QXM.TO
QXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
TLV.TO
TLV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
TLV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QXM.TO vs. TLV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) and Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QXM.TOTLV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.85
3.90

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.72
5.89

-3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.82

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

7.15

-4.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.52

33.01

-23.50

QXM.TO vs. TLV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QXM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the TLV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QXM.TO and TLV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QXM.TO vs. TLV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.65%, which is greater than TLV.TO's maximum drawdown of -37.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QXM.TO and TLV.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QXM.TOTLV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.65%

-37.68%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-4.07%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.72%

-9.83%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.01%

-19.36%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.65%

-37.68%

-2.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.73%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-4.04%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

0.88%

+1.65%

Volatility

QXM.TO vs. TLV.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO) at 1.99%. This indicates that QXM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QXM.TOTLV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

1.99%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.23%

6.00%

+5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

7.46%

+5.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.84%

9.97%

+3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.64%

12.67%

+2.97%

Dividends

QXM.TO vs. TLV.TO - Dividend Comparison

QXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than TLV.TO's 2.92% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QXM.TO
CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF		1.01%1.17%1.27%1.39%1.51%1.02%1.27%1.39%1.65%1.36%1.56%1.52%
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF		2.92%3.25%3.40%4.12%4.01%2.49%2.75%3.74%4.28%3.58%3.46%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

QXM.TO and TLV.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: CI and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QXM.TO and TLV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer