PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QWTM.L vs. CLO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QWTM.L vs. CLO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L) and Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF USD Acc (CLO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QWTM.L is traded in GBp, while CLO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CLO.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QWTM.L achieves a 51.52% return, which is significantly higher than CLO.L's 11.29% return.


QWTM.L

1D
-1.88%
1M
20.99%
YTD
51.52%
6M
41.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLO.L

1D
1.71%
1M
13.74%
YTD
11.29%
6M
9.15%
1Y
8.82%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QWTM.L vs. CLO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QWTM.L and CLO.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QWTM.L vs. CLO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QWTM.L

CLO.L
CLO.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CLO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CLO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QWTM.L vs. CLO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L) and Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF USD Acc (CLO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QWTM.L vs. CLO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QWTM.LCLO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.11

-0.17

+3.28

Drawdowns

QWTM.L vs. CLO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QWTM.L drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, smaller than the maximum CLO.L drawdown of -44.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QWTM.L and CLO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QWTM.LCLO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.74%

-44.92%

+21.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.22%

-18.51%

+14.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.21%

-29.65%

+19.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.98%

Volatility

QWTM.L vs. CLO.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QWTM.LCLO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.18%

28.84%

+10.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.18%

32.78%

+6.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.18%

32.78%

+6.40%

QWTM.L vs. CLO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QWTM.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CLO.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

QWTM.L vs. CLO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither QWTM.L nor CLO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QWTM.L and CLO.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QWTM.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QWTM.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CLO.L.

QWTM.L tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index, while CLO.L tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for QWTM.L and 0.55% for CLO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QWTM.L and CLO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer