CLO.L vs. QYLP.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLO.L (Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF USD Acc) and QYLP.L (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - CLO.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while QYLP.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CLO.L returned 9.45%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for QYLP.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLO.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QYLP.L.

Performance

CLO.L vs. QYLP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF USD Acc (CLO.L) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CLO.L is traded in USD, while QYLP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the QYLP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLO.L achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly higher than QYLP.L's 5.38% return.

CLO.L

• 1D: -2.51%
• 1M: 19.25%
• YTD: 8.97%
• 6M: 8.28%
• 1Y: 7.30%
• 3Y*: 9.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLP.L

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 2.66%
• YTD: 5.38%
• 6M: 6.79%
• 1Y: 18.06%
• 3Y*: 9.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLO.L vs. QYLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CLO.L Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF USD Acc	8.97%	-5.35%	4.79%	43.74%	2.89%
QYLP.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP	5.38%	2.73%	19.38%	20.99%	-17.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CLO.L and QYLP.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022	0.35

The correlation between CLO.L and QYLP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.36 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CLO.L vs. QYLP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CLO.L	QYLP.L
Technology	85.3%	24.2%
Real Estate	5.6%	2.3%
Communication Services	5.5%	10.0%
Consumer Cyclical	3.0%	17.6%
Healthcare	0.6%	7.6%
Basic Materials	-	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.0%
Energy	-	0.2%
Financial Services	-	15.8%
Industrials	-	8.3%
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

CLO.L vs. QYLP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLO.L

CLO.L Risk / Return Rank: 13
CLO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
CLO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CLO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 14
CLO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CLO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 12

QYLP.L

QYLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
QYLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QYLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QYLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QYLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
QYLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLO.L vs. QYLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF USD Acc (CLO.L) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLO.L	QYLP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	2.03	-1.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.55	3.06	-2.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.39	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.27	3.51	-3.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.66	14.90	-14.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLO.L vs. QYLP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLO.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the QYLP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLO.L and QYLP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLO.L	QYLP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25	2.03	-1.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.18	0.51	-0.69

Drawdowns

CLO.L vs. QYLP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLO.L drawdown since its inception was -52.92%, which is greater than QYLP.L's maximum drawdown of -20.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLO.L and QYLP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLO.L	QYLP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.92%	-20.02%	-32.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.59%	-5.12%	-21.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.11%	-20.02%	-12.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.33%	-0.36%	-19.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.99%	-4.52%	-28.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.06%	1.21%	+9.85%

Volatility

CLO.L vs. QYLP.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF USD Acc (CLO.L) has a higher volatility of 13.57% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L) at 2.49%. This indicates that CLO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLO.L	QYLP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.57%	2.49%	+11.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.94%	7.14%	+17.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.62%	8.87%	+19.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.40%	14.79%	+19.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.40%	14.79%	+19.61%

CLO.L vs. QYLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLO.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLP.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLO.L vs. QYLP.L - Dividend Comparison

CLO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CLO.L Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLP.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP	7.67%	8.93%	8.31%	9.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLO.L and QYLP.L in my portfolio?

CLO.L and QYLP.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLO.L or QYLP.L?

On fees, QYLP.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLO.L or QYLP.L?

QYLP.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CLO.L.

What is the main difference between CLO.L and QYLP.L?

CLO.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while QYLP.L is Nasdaq-100. CLO.L tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while QYLP.L tracks Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CLO.L and 0.45% for QYLP.L.