QVOL vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

QVOL (Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. QVOL charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

QVOL vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF (QVOL) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QVOL

• 1D: 3.38%
• 1M: 6.29%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -1.50%
• YTD: 5.59%
• 6M: 5.90%
• 1Y: 12.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVOL vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QVOL Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF	8.42%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between QVOL and OMAH is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2026	-0.19

Return for Risk

QVOL vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVOL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 58
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 47
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVOL vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF (QVOL) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QVOL	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.65	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.30	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.40	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.60	—

Drawdowns

QVOL vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVOL drawdown since its inception was -8.29%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVOL and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	QVOL	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.29%	-11.83%	+3.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-1.70%	+1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.05%	-1.26%	-0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QVOL	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.55%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.53%	8.04%	+24.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.53%	13.06%	+19.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.53%	13.06%	+19.47%

QVOL vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVOL has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

QVOL vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

QVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than OMAH's 15.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.29%	12.86%
QVOL Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF	0.94%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QVOL and OMAH in my portfolio?

QVOL and OMAH have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QVOL or OMAH?

On fees, QVOL is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QVOL or OMAH?

QVOL is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QVOL or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.29%, compared with 0.94% for QVOL.

What is the main difference between QVOL and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Infrastructure Capital Advisors and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for QVOL and 0.95% for OMAH.