QVOL vs. CWII
QVOL (Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF) and CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QVOL charges 0.82%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for CWII.
Performance
QVOL vs. CWII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QVOL
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -7.44%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CWII
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QVOL vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QVOL Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF | 0.35% |
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 9,514.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVOL and CWII is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVOL vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF (QVOL) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QVOL vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVOL | CWII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.03% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | — | — |
Volatility
QVOL vs. CWII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVOL | CWII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.89% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.89% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.89% | — | — |
QVOL vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVOL has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVOL vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison
QVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, while CWII has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 123.26% | 6.09% |
QVOL Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF | 2.10% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVOL and CWII have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QVOL is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QVOL is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.
CWII has the higher dividend yield at 123.26%, compared with 2.10% for QVOL.
They also come from different issuers: Infrastructure Capital Advisors and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for QVOL and 1.03% for CWII.
Find the right allocation for QVOL and CWII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer