QVMT vs. XMMO
QVMT (Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVMT is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QVMT returned 12.55%/yr vs 18.04%/yr for XMMO. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QVMT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
QVMT vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVMT achieves a 14.62% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's 11.79% return. Over the past 10 years, QVMT has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 12.55%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.04% annualized return.
QVMT
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- YTD
- 14.62%
- 1Y
- 32.14%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.80%
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- YTD
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- 20.56%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.41%
- 10Y*
- 18.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $936.15K | $987.45K | $703.91K | |
| $60.32M | $71.93M | $66.65M |
QVMT vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 14.62% | 19.08% | 14.40% | 11.71% | -5.61% | 35.27% | -9.98% | 28.86% | -9.51% | 18.77% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 11.79% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMT and XMMO is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2015 | 0.60 |
The correlation between QVMT and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVMT vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
QVMT
XMMO
QVMT vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QVMT | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.17 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 1.38 | +1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.45 | 5.81 | +7.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QVMT vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.05%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMT and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVMT | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.05% | -55.37% | +7.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -13.91% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.42% | -24.93% | +10.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -27.91% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.05% | -36.74% | -11.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.15% | -11.24% | +4.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -9.42% | +3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 3.29% | -1.04% |
Volatility
QVMT vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) is 6.32%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.88%. This indicates that QVMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVMT | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | 7.88% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.06% | 18.46% | -6.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.90% | 21.50% | -6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 21.86% | -4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 22.43% | -1.21% |
QVMT vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVMT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVMT vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
QVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than XMMO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 1.90% | 2.42% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 2.70% | 2.23% | 2.48% | 2.37% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.63% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVMT and XMMO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to QVMT (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMT dropped -48.05% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 18.04% vs 12.55% for QVMT. On fees, QVMT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, QVMT has been the lower-risk option at 6.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 18.04% return vs 12.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVMT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
QVMT has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.63% for XMMO.
QVMT is categorized as S&P 500, while XMMO is Momentum. QVMT tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for QVMT and 0.35% for XMMO.
QVMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVMT and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer