QVMT vs. SPMV
QVMT (Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF) and SPMV (Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF) are both S&P 500 funds from Invesco - QVMT tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index while SPMV tracks the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QVMT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for SPMV.
Performance
QVMT vs. SPMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QVMT
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 21.53%
- 6M
- 20.96%
- 1Y
- 37.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.47%
- 5Y*
- 13.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.51%
SPMV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QVMT vs. SPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 21.53% | 19.08% | 14.40% | 11.71% | -5.61% | 35.27% | -9.98% | 28.86% | -9.51% | 12.57% |
SPMV Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF | 0.87% | 11.69% | 18.78% | 10.28% | -10.84% | 24.35% | 8.57% | 32.13% | -6.28% | 7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMT and SPMV is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017 | 0.60 |
The correlation between QVMT and SPMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVMT vs. SPMV — Risk / Return Rank
QVMT
SPMV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QVMT vs. SPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QVMT | SPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.04 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QVMT vs. SPMV - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVMT | SPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | — | — |
Volatility
QVMT vs. SPMV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVMT | SPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | — | — |
QVMT vs. SPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVMT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QVMT vs. SPMV - Dividend Comparison
QVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, while SPMV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 1.79% | 2.42% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 2.70% | 2.23% | 2.48% | 2.37% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
SPMV Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF | 1.05% | 1.53% | 1.53% | 2.28% | 1.79% | 1.28% | 1.71% | 3.13% | 2.11% | 1.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVMT and SPMV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for QVMT.
QVMT has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.05% for SPMV.
QVMT tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index, while SPMV tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for QVMT and 0.10% for SPMV.
Find the right allocation for QVMT and SPMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer