QVMT vs. IDMO
QVMT (Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVMT is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QVMT returned 13.28%/yr vs 13.51%/yr for IDMO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QVMT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.
Performance
QVMT vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVMT achieves a 19.11% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 9.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QVMT having a 13.28% annualized return and IDMO not far ahead at 13.51%.
QVMT
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 19.11%
- 6M
- 19.12%
- 1Y
- 34.42%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
IDMO
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- 1Y
- 26.34%
- 3Y*
- 26.46%
- 5Y*
- 15.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.51%
QVMT vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 19.11% | 19.08% | 14.40% | 11.71% | -5.61% | 35.27% | -9.98% | 28.86% | -9.51% | 18.77% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 9.69% | 42.17% | 12.79% | 20.16% | -12.03% | 14.31% | 22.01% | 26.09% | -16.66% | 29.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMT and IDMO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2015 | 0.45 |
The correlation between QVMT and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVMT vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank
QVMT
IDMO
QVMT vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QVMT | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.27 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.53 | 2.15 | +3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.46 | 8.70 | +10.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QVMT vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.05%, which is greater than IDMO's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMT and IDMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVMT | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.05% | -39.38% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.25% | -12.31% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.42% | -12.65% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -27.07% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.05% | -31.34% | -16.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | -2.67% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -9.73% | +3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 3.03% | -1.26% |
Volatility
QVMT vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) is 5.11%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that QVMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVMT | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 7.84% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 16.34% | -6.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 18.13% | -4.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 18.09% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 17.95% | +3.15% |
QVMT vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVMT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QVMT vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison
QVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than IDMO's 3.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.64% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 1.83% | 2.42% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 2.70% | 2.23% | 2.48% | 2.37% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVMT and IDMO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDMO has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to QVMT (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMT dropped -48.05% vs IDMO's -39.38%.
On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 13.51% vs 13.28% for QVMT. On fees, QVMT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, QVMT has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 13.51% return vs 13.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVMT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 1.83% for QVMT.
QVMT is categorized as S&P 500, while IDMO is Momentum. QVMT tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for QVMT and 0.25% for IDMO.
QVMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVMT and IDMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer