PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVMS vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVMS vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVMS achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 4.38% return.


QVMS

1D
-0.75%
1M
2.44%
YTD
15.96%
6M
14.49%
1Y
31.77%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
10Y*

SPHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
4.38%
6M
4.63%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVMS vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QVMS
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF
15.96%5.56%9.50%16.89%-14.61%4.45%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.38%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between QVMS and SPHD is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.68

The correlation between QVMS and SPHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVMS vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVMS
SPHD

Financial Services

18.3%
15.6%

Industrials

16.7%
0.0%

Technology

15.5%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
3.4%

Healthcare

10.8%
5.1%

Energy

7.5%
14.1%

Real Estate

7.1%
20.1%

Basic Materials

4.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
17.8%

Utilities

2.1%
13.7%

Communication Services

1.7%
8.6%

Financial Services

QVMS
18.3%
SPHD
15.6%

Industrials

QVMS
16.7%
SPHD
0.0%

Technology

QVMS
15.5%
SPHD
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QVMS
13.2%
SPHD
3.4%

Healthcare

QVMS
10.8%
SPHD
5.1%

Energy

QVMS
7.5%
SPHD
14.1%

Real Estate

QVMS
7.1%
SPHD
20.1%

Basic Materials

QVMS
4.5%
SPHD

-

Consumer Defensive

QVMS
2.6%
SPHD
17.8%

Utilities

QVMS
2.1%
SPHD
13.7%

Communication Services

QVMS
1.7%
SPHD
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVMS vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVMS
QVMS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QVMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVMS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QVMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVMS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVMS vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVMSSPHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.13

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

1.11

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.26

2.78

+9.48

QVMS vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVMS and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVMSSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

0.74

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.58

-0.25

Drawdowns

QVMS vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVMS drawdown since its inception was -28.05%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMS and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVMSSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.05%

-41.39%

+13.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-7.33%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.05%

-13.29%

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-5.37%

+4.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.10%

-4.70%

-4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.93%

-0.33%

Volatility

QVMS vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.99%. This indicates that QVMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVMSSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

2.99%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

7.55%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.62%

11.04%

+6.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

14.16%

+7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.25%

17.64%

+3.61%

QVMS vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVMS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVMS vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

QVMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than SPHD's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QVMS
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.13%1.10%1.53%1.51%1.58%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.62%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVMS and SPHD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QVMS has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to SPHD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMS dropped -28.05% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 3-year performance, QVMS leads with 14.97% vs 11.42% for SPHD. On fees, QVMS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QVMS has performed better with a 14.97% return vs 11.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVMS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 1.13% for QVMS.

QVMS is categorized as Multi-factor, while SPHD is Dividend. QVMS tracks S&P Small Cap 600, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QVMS and 0.30% for SPHD.

QVMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVMS and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer