QVMS vs. AAVM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QVMS (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF) and AAVM (Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF) are both Multi-factor funds. QVMS is passively managed, while AAVM is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QVMS returned 14.97%/yr vs 19.57%/yr for AAVM. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QVMS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AAVM.

Performance

QVMS vs. AAVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVMS achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly lower than AAVM's 17.28% return.

QVMS

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 15.96%
• 6M: 14.49%
• 1Y: 31.77%
• 3Y*: 14.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAVM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 3.80%
• YTD: 17.28%
• 6M: 20.07%
• 1Y: 34.59%
• 3Y*: 19.57%
• 5Y*: 6.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVMS vs. AAVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QVMS Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF	15.96%	5.56%	9.50%	16.89%	-14.61%	4.45%
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF	17.28%	18.54%	12.07%	-0.74%	-7.00%	-1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between QVMS and AAVM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.69

The correlation between QVMS and AAVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.79 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QVMS vs. AAVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QVMS	AAVM
Financial Services	18.3%	1.3%
Industrials	16.7%	28.7%
Technology	15.5%	14.4%
Consumer Cyclical	13.2%	15.3%
Healthcare	10.8%	5.8%
Energy	7.5%	6.0%
Real Estate	7.1%	1.4%
Basic Materials	4.5%	15.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	4.0%
Utilities	2.1%	4.3%
Communication Services	1.7%	3.4%

Return for Risk

QVMS vs. AAVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVMS

QVMS Risk / Return Rank: 59
QVMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
QVMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QVMS Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QVMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QVMS Martin Ratio Rank: 67

AAVM

AAVM Risk / Return Rank: 69
AAVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
AAVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
AAVM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
AAVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AAVM Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVMS vs. AAVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QVMS	AAVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.28	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	3.20	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.42	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	3.20	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.26	13.42	-1.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QVMS vs. AAVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the AAVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVMS and AAVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QVMS	AAVM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	2.28	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.35	-0.02

Drawdowns

QVMS vs. AAVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVMS drawdown since its inception was -28.05%, smaller than the maximum AAVM drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMS and AAVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QVMS	AAVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.05%	-34.71%	+6.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-10.85%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.05%	-20.23%	-7.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-0.55%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.10%	-13.32%	+4.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	2.58%	+0.02%

Volatility

QVMS vs. AAVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM) have volatilities of 4.76% and 5.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QVMS	AAVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.76%	5.00%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.05%	12.87%	-0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.62%	15.26%	+2.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.25%	15.68%	+5.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.25%	14.90%	+6.35%

QVMS vs. AAVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVMS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AAVM's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

QVMS vs. AAVM - Dividend Comparison

QVMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than AAVM's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF	1.75%	2.05%	2.54%	4.13%	2.24%	0.82%	0.00%	1.76%	0.93%	0.81%
QVMS Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF	1.13%	1.10%	1.53%	1.51%	1.58%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QVMS and AAVM in my portfolio?

QVMS and AAVM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QVMS or AAVM?

AAVM has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to QVMS (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMS dropped -28.05% vs AAVM's -34.71%.

Which ETF is better, QVMS or AAVM?

On 3-year performance, AAVM leads with 19.57% vs 14.97% for QVMS. On fees, QVMS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QVMS has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QVMS or AAVM?

Over the 3-year period, AAVM has performed better with a 19.57% return vs 14.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QVMS or AAVM?

QVMS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AAVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QVMS or AAVM?

AAVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.13% for QVMS.

What is the main difference between QVMS and AAVM?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QVMS and 0.45% for AAVM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.