QVAL vs. IVV
QVAL (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVAL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. QVAL is actively managed, while IVV is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QVAL returned 11.91%/yr vs 15.75%/yr for IVV. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QVAL charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
QVAL vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 14.07% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 9.76% return. Over the past 10 years, QVAL has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 11.91%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.75% annualized return.
QVAL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 14.07%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 29.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
IVV
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.76%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.75%
QVAL vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 14.07% | 10.98% | 12.21% | 28.40% | -11.80% | 34.40% | -5.93% | 24.06% | -17.28% | 25.59% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 9.76% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVAL and IVV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.71 |
The correlation between QVAL and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QVAL vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QVAL
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
QVAL
IVV
Energy
QVAL
IVV
Industrials
QVAL
IVV
Healthcare
QVAL
IVV
Consumer Defensive
QVAL
IVV
Technology
QVAL
IVV
Communication Services
QVAL
IVV
Basic Materials
QVAL
IVV
Utilities
QVAL
IVV
Real Estate
QVAL
IVV
Financial Services
QVAL
-
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVAL vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
QVAL
IVV
QVAL vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QVAL | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.86 | 3.03 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | 13.61 | +0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QVAL vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVAL | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.49% | -55.25% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.04% | -8.89% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -18.75% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.17% | -24.53% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.49% | -33.90% | -17.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -1.74% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -10.76% | +2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 1.98% | +0.17% |
Volatility
QVAL vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) is 3.99%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that QVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVAL | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 4.67% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 9.75% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.74% | 12.41% | +2.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 16.97% | +4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 18.10% | +4.70% |
QVAL vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVAL vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than IVV's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 1.16% | 1.44% | 1.72% | 1.76% | 2.00% | 1.23% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 1.30% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVAL and IVV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVV has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to QVAL (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.75% vs 11.91% for QVAL. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, QVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.75% return vs 11.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QVAL.
QVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.
QVAL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVAL and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer