QVAL vs. IVV
Compare and contrast key facts about Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).
QVAL and IVV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QVAL is a passively managed fund by EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC that tracks the performance of the QVAL-US - Alpha Architect Quantitative Value Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2014. IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000. Both QVAL and IVV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QVAL or IVV.
Key characteristics
| QVAL | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.50% | 26.84% |
| 1Y Return | 29.12% | 37.57% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.10% | 10.21% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.99% | 15.93% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.65% | 13.40% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.86 | 3.06 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.70 | 4.08 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.32 | 1.58 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.89 | 4.45 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.32 | 20.15 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.59% | 1.86% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.71% | 12.21% |
| Max Drawdown | -51.49% | -55.25% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.39% | -0.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVAL and IVV is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QVAL vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 26.84% return. Over the past 10 years, QVAL has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 7.65%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.40% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QVAL vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QVAL vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QVAL vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than IVV's 1.24% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 1.62% | 1.76% | 2.00% | 1.22% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 0.15% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.24% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.99% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% | 1.83% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
QVAL vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and IVV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QVAL vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 3.89%. This indicates that QVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.