PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVAL vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVAL vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QVAL having a 11.64% annualized return and DBO not far behind at 11.37%.


QVAL

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.34%
YTD
14.68%
6M
15.27%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
11.64%

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVAL vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
14.68%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%34.40%-5.93%24.06%-17.28%25.59%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between QVAL and DBO is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.28

The correlation between QVAL and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QVAL vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVAL
DBO

Consumer Cyclical

32.4%

-

Technology

16.7%

-

Industrials

15.0%

-

Healthcare

11.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.9%

-

Basic Materials

7.6%

-

Energy

5.5%

-

Communication Services

3.8%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Financial Services

-

116.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

QVAL
32.4%
DBO

-

Technology

QVAL
16.7%
DBO

-

Industrials

QVAL
15.0%
DBO

-

Healthcare

QVAL
11.1%
DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

QVAL
7.9%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

QVAL
7.6%
DBO

-

Energy

QVAL
5.5%
DBO

-

Communication Services

QVAL
3.8%
DBO

-

Real Estate

QVAL
2.0%
DBO

-

Financial Services

QVAL

-

DBO
116.0%

Utilities

QVAL

-

DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVAL vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVAL vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVALDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

4.44

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.98

9.02

+4.96

QVAL vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVAL and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVALDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.34

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.50

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.36

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.02

+0.47

Drawdowns

QVAL vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVALDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.49%

-90.18%

+38.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

-18.19%

+12.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-28.20%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-37.68%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

-61.69%

+10.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-51.38%

+50.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-62.25%

+54.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

8.92%

-6.79%

Volatility

QVAL vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) is 4.16%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that QVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVALDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

12.61%

-8.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

28.20%

-18.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

34.46%

-20.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.63%

32.29%

-10.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

31.78%

-8.99%

QVAL vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVAL vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than DBO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%0.00%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.46%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVAL and DBO have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to QVAL (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, QVAL leads with 11.64% vs 11.37% for DBO. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, QVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QVAL has performed better with a 11.64% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.46% for QVAL.

QVAL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVAL and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer