QUU.TO vs. QDX.TO
QUU.TO (Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF) and QDX.TO (Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index, while QDX.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QUU.TO returned 16.94%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for QDX.TO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QUU.TO charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for QDX.TO.
Performance
QUU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUU.TO achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly higher than QDX.TO's 11.04% return.
QUU.TO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- 13.03%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 30.75%
- 3Y*
- 24.45%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- —
QDX.TO
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 11.04%
- 6M
- 11.30%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- —
QUU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUU.TO Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF | 13.03% | 13.08% | 35.77% | 25.01% | -15.10% | 26.45% | 18.85% | 24.81% | 0.45% |
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF | 11.04% | 25.29% | 12.93% | 13.66% | -8.61% | 11.24% | 5.06% | 15.27% | -8.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUU.TO and QDX.TO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2018 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, QUU.TO and QDX.TO have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.44, meaning their price movements have been converging.
QUU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QUU.TO
QDX.TO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
QUU.TO
QDX.TO
Communication Services
QUU.TO
QDX.TO
Financial Services
QUU.TO
QDX.TO
Consumer Cyclical
QUU.TO
QDX.TO
Healthcare
QUU.TO
QDX.TO
Industrials
QUU.TO
QDX.TO
Consumer Defensive
QUU.TO
QDX.TO
Energy
QUU.TO
QDX.TO
Utilities
QUU.TO
QDX.TO
Basic Materials
QUU.TO
QDX.TO
Real Estate
QUU.TO
QDX.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUU.TO vs. QDX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QUU.TO
QDX.TO
QUU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) and Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QUU.TO | QDX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.31 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 2.23 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.05 | 8.72 | +4.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QUU.TO | QDX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 1.70 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 0.83 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.57 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
QUU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUU.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, roughly equal to the maximum QDX.TO drawdown of -28.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUU.TO and QDX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUU.TO | QDX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.86% | -28.08% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -10.88% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.23% | -14.25% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.00% | -23.00% | -1.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -4.54% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 2.78% | -0.42% |
Volatility
QUU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) is 3.73%, while Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that QUU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUU.TO | QDX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 4.67% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | 12.02% | -2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.23% | 14.29% | -2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.30% | 13.94% | +1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 15.48% | +1.81% |
QUU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUU.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QDX.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QUU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Dividend Comparison
QUU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than QDX.TO's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF | 2.61% | 2.51% | 2.48% | 2.61% | 2.73% | 2.25% | 1.91% | 2.76% | 3.03% |
QUU.TO Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF | 0.88% | 0.97% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 0.98% | 1.34% | 1.59% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUU.TO and QDX.TO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QUU.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QUU.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for QDX.TO.
QUU.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QDX.TO is Foreign Large Cap Equities. QUU.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index, while QDX.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for QUU.TO and 0.17% for QDX.TO.
Find the right allocation for QUU.TO and QDX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer