QUU.TO vs. MSTR
QUU.TO (Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index, while MSTR (Strategy Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, QUU.TO returned 16.84%/yr vs 26.34%/yr for MSTR. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QUU.TO vs. MSTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QUU.TO is traded in CAD, while MSTR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSTR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUU.TO achieves a 12.55% return, which is significantly higher than MSTR's -9.67% return.
QUU.TO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 7.58%
- YTD
- 12.55%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 30.09%
- 3Y*
- 24.23%
- 5Y*
- 16.84%
- 10Y*
- —
MSTR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -24.79%
- YTD
- -9.67%
- 6M
- -28.34%
- 1Y
- -64.57%
- 3Y*
- 66.84%
- 5Y*
- 26.34%
- 10Y*
- 22.68%
QUU.TO vs. MSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUU.TO Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF | 12.55% | 13.08% | 35.77% | 25.01% | -15.10% | 26.45% | 18.85% | 24.81% | -1.07% |
MSTR Strategy Inc | -15.66% | -49.94% | 397.93% | 336.33% | -72.15% | 38.87% | 167.81% | 6.16% | 2.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUU.TO and MSTR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2018 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUU.TO vs. MSTR — Risk / Return Rank
QUU.TO
MSTR
QUU.TO vs. MSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QUU.TO | MSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 0.82 | +0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | -0.85 | +4.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.77 | -1.26 | +14.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QUU.TO | MSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | -0.94 | +3.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 0.30 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.38 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
QUU.TO vs. MSTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUU.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, smaller than the maximum MSTR drawdown of -88.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUU.TO and MSTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUU.TO | MSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.86% | -88.54% | +61.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -76.48% | +67.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.23% | -77.85% | +58.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.00% | -82.70% | +58.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -71.56% | +71.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -32.30% | +27.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 51.25% | -48.89% |
Volatility
QUU.TO vs. MSTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) is 3.79%, while Strategy Inc (MSTR) has a volatility of 18.48%. This indicates that QUU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUU.TO | MSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 18.48% | -14.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | 55.68% | -46.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.24% | 69.26% | -57.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.30% | 89.13% | -73.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 72.45% | -55.16% |
Dividends
QUU.TO vs. MSTR - Dividend Comparison
QUU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while MSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTR Strategy Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUU.TO Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF | 0.88% | 0.97% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 0.98% | 1.34% | 1.59% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUU.TO and MSTR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for QUU.TO and MSTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer