QUU.TO vs. MGRW.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QUU.TO (Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF) and MGRW.TO (Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index, while MGRW.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Mackenzie. QUU.TO is passively managed, while MGRW.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QUU.TO returned 16.94%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for MGRW.TO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

QUU.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) and Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUU.TO achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly higher than MGRW.TO's 9.90% return.

QUU.TO

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 6.93%
• YTD: 13.03%
• 6M: 11.12%
• 1Y: 30.75%
• 3Y*: 24.45%
• 5Y*: 16.94%
• 10Y*: —

MGRW.TO

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 4.58%
• YTD: 9.90%
• 6M: 9.89%
• 1Y: 25.85%
• 3Y*: 19.61%
• 5Y*: 12.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUU.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QUU.TO Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF	13.03%	13.08%	35.77%	25.01%	-15.10%	26.45%	7.54%
MGRW.TO Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF	9.90%	18.19%	21.41%	15.35%	-9.30%	13.37%	7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between QUU.TO and MGRW.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020	0.43

The correlation between QUU.TO and MGRW.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QUU.TO vs. MGRW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUU.TO

QUU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 76
QUU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
QUU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
QUU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QUU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QUU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

MGRW.TO

MGRW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 84
MGRW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
MGRW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
MGRW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 89
MGRW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
MGRW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUU.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) and Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QUU.TO	MGRW.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	2.64	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	3.96	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.56	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	3.87	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.05	15.91	-2.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QUU.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the MGRW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUU.TO and MGRW.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QUU.TO	MGRW.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	2.64	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.11	1.14	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	1.25	-0.33

Drawdowns

QUU.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUU.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, which is greater than MGRW.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUU.TO and MGRW.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QUU.TO	MGRW.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.86%	-17.20%	-9.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.81%	-6.72%	-2.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.23%	-12.17%	-7.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.00%	-17.20%	-6.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-3.37%	-1.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	1.63%	+0.73%

Volatility

QUU.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Volatility Comparison

Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO) at 3.39%. This indicates that QUU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGRW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QUU.TO	MGRW.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	3.39%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.22%	8.09%	+1.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.23%	9.87%	+2.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.30%	10.68%	+4.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.29%	10.49%	+6.80%

Dividends

QUU.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Dividend Comparison

QUU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than MGRW.TO's 1.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MGRW.TO Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF	1.73%	1.84%	1.93%	2.28%	2.44%	1.77%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%
QUU.TO Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF	0.88%	0.97%	1.00%	1.21%	1.59%	0.98%	1.34%	1.59%	1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QUU.TO and MGRW.TO in my portfolio?

QUU.TO and MGRW.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between QUU.TO and MGRW.TO?

QUU.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MGRW.TO is Diversified Portfolio.