MGRW.TO vs. QTIP.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO) and Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QTIP.NEO).
MGRW.TO and QTIP.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MGRW.TO is an actively managed fund by Mackenzie. It was launched on Sep 29, 2020. QTIP.NEO is a passively managed fund by Mackenzie that tracks the performance of the Solactive US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Hedged to CAD TR Index. It was launched on Jan 24, 2018.
Performance
MGRW.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGRW.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGRW.TO Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF | -2.32% | 18.19% | 21.41% | 15.35% | -9.30% | 13.37% | 7.50% |
QTIP.NEO Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.29% | 4.82% | 0.82% | 3.50% | -12.98% | 6.05% | 1.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGRW.TO achieves a -2.32% return, which is significantly lower than QTIP.NEO's 0.29% return.
MGRW.TO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- -2.32%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 14.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
QTIP.NEO
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 1.29%
- 3Y*
- 1.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.54%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGRW.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
MGRW.TO vs. QTIP.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
MGRW.TO
QTIP.NEO
MGRW.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO) and Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QTIP.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGRW.TO | QTIP.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 0.32 | +1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 0.46 | +1.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.06 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 0.59 | +0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | 1.43 | +5.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGRW.TO | QTIP.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 0.32 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.09 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.34 | +0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGRW.TO and QTIP.NEO is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MGRW.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Dividend Comparison
MGRW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than QTIP.NEO's 4.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGRW.TO Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF | 1.94% | 1.84% | 1.93% | 2.28% | 2.44% | 1.77% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTIP.NEO Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 4.31% | 4.54% | 4.53% | 5.08% | 9.47% | 5.24% | 2.17% | 2.29% | 2.91% |
Drawdowns
MGRW.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGRW.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, which is greater than QTIP.NEO's maximum drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGRW.TO and QTIP.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGRW.TO | QTIP.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.20% | -15.03% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -2.65% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.20% | -15.03% | -2.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.60% | -4.64% | -1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -4.80% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 1.09% | +1.09% |
Volatility
MGRW.TO vs. QTIP.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Mackenzie US TIPS Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QTIP.NEO) at 1.37%. This indicates that MGRW.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTIP.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGRW.TO | QTIP.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 1.37% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.07% | 2.49% | +4.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.14% | 4.10% | +7.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 6.26% | +4.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 6.36% | +4.01% |