QUSA vs. IPDP

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

QUSA (VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. QUSA charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

QUSA vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QUSA

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: 8.82%
• 6M: 7.93%
• 1Y: 5.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUSA vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF	8.49%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

QUSA vs. IPDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QUSA	IPDP
Technology	37.9%	13.1%
Consumer Defensive	16.7%	3.9%
Financial Services	13.0%	18.6%
Communication Services	12.9%	-
Industrials	9.8%	45.1%
Healthcare	9.6%	13.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.6%
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

QUSA vs. IPDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUSA

QUSA Risk / Return Rank: 15
QUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
QUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
QUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 15
QUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
QUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 15

IPDP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUSA vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QUSA	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.22	—	—

Drawdowns

QUSA vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUSA drawdown since its inception was -10.64%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUSA and IPDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	QUSA	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.64%	0.00%	-10.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.71%	0.00%	-1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	0.00%	-3.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QUSA	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.72%	0.00%	+10.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.64%	0.00%	+10.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.64%	0.00%	+10.64%

QUSA vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUSA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

QUSA vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

QUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.59%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF	12.59%	6.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QUSA or IPDP?

On fees, QUSA is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QUSA or IPDP?

QUSA is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QUSA or IPDP?

QUSA has the higher dividend yield at 12.59%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between QUSA and IPDP?

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QUSA and 1.52% for IPDP.