QUSA vs. ACKY

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

QUSA (VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF) and ACKY (VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from VistaShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

QUSA vs. ACKY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA) and VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUSA achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly higher than ACKY's -0.98% return.

QUSA

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -0.36%
• 6M: 7.91%
• YTD: 9.61%
• 1Y: 5.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACKY

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.53%
• 6M: -4.64%
• YTD: -0.98%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUSA vs. ACKY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF	9.61%	-4.17%
ACKY VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF	-0.98%	4.04%

Correlation

The correlation between QUSA and ACKY is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025	0.57

QUSA vs. ACKY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QUSA	ACKY
Technology	37.9%	27.4%
Consumer Defensive	16.7%	-
Financial Services	13.0%	25.2%
Communication Services	12.9%	11.0%
Industrials	9.8%	0.2%
Healthcare	9.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	27.6%
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	9.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

QUSA vs. ACKY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUSA

QUSA Risk / Return Rank: 17
QUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
QUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
QUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 17
QUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
QUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 16

ACKY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUSA vs. ACKY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA) and VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QUSA	ACKY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.19	—	—

Drawdowns

QUSA vs. ACKY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUSA drawdown since its inception was -10.64%, smaller than the maximum ACKY drawdown of -14.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUSA and ACKY.

Drawdown Indicators

	QUSA	ACKY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.64%	-14.63%	+3.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-4.67%	+2.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.60%	-3.66%	+0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.25%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QUSA	ACKY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.56%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.98%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.90%	15.72%	-4.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.70%	15.72%	-5.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.70%	15.72%	-5.02%

QUSA vs. ACKY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QUSA and ACKY have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

QUSA vs. ACKY - Dividend Comparison

QUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.91%, more than ACKY's 13.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ACKY VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF	13.26%	5.06%
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF	13.91%	6.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QUSA and ACKY in my portfolio?

QUSA and ACKY have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QUSA or ACKY?

Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QUSA or ACKY?

QUSA and ACKY have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QUSA or ACKY?

QUSA has the higher dividend yield at 13.91%, compared with 13.26% for ACKY.