PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUS vs. NRSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUS vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUS achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 35.88% return.


QUS

1D
0.83%
1M
1.29%
6M
7.60%
YTD
10.23%
1Y
19.80%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
13.54%
ALL TIME*
12.75%

NRSH

1D
1.65%
1M
-3.34%
6M
23.82%
YTD
35.88%
1Y
50.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$198.65K$150.08K$89.39K
$3.01M$4.81M$3.43M

QUS vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QUS
State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
10.23%14.13%18.99%5.02%
NRSH
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF
35.88%12.95%-6.17%9.15%

Correlation

The correlation between QUS and NRSH is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023

0.61

The correlation between QUS and NRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

QUS vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QUS
NRSH

Technology

28.4%
56.1%

Financial Services

15.7%

-

Healthcare

14.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.3%

-

Communication Services

8.2%

-

Industrials

8.1%
41.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%

-

Utilities

3.9%

-

Energy

3.3%
2.5%

Basic Materials

2.2%

-

Real Estate

1.6%
2.8%

Technology

QUS
28.4%
NRSH
56.1%

Financial Services

QUS
15.7%
NRSH

-

Healthcare

QUS
14.4%
NRSH

-

Consumer Defensive

QUS
8.3%
NRSH

-

Communication Services

QUS
8.2%
NRSH

-

Industrials

QUS
8.1%
NRSH
41.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QUS
5.7%
NRSH

-

Utilities

QUS
3.9%
NRSH

-

Energy

QUS
3.3%
NRSH
2.5%

Basic Materials

QUS
2.2%
NRSH

-

Real Estate

QUS
1.6%
NRSH
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUS vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

NRSH
NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QUS vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QUSNRSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.63

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.95

12.40

+0.55

QUS vs. NRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the NRSH Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUS and NRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUS vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUS drawdown since its inception was -33.78%, which is greater than NRSH's maximum drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUS and NRSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUSNRSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.78%

-24.01%

-9.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

-13.84%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.72%

+8.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-5.58%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

4.05%

-2.52%

Volatility

QUS vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) is 2.42%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 8.71%. This indicates that QUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUSNRSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

8.71%

-6.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.97%

23.07%

-16.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.22%

27.49%

-18.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

22.50%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.40%

22.50%

-6.10%

QUS vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QUS vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison

QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than NRSH's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NRSH
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF
0.31%0.42%0.90%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUS
State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.27%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


QUS and NRSH have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRSH has higher volatility (8.71%) compared to QUS (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUS dropped -33.78% vs NRSH's -24.01%.

On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 50.05% vs 19.80% for QUS. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 50.05% return vs 19.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.31% for NRSH.

QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index, while NRSH tracks Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUS and 0.75% for NRSH.

QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUS and NRSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer