QULL vs. XTJL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QULL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. QULL is passively managed, while XTJL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QULL returned 32.28%/yr vs 14.68%/yr for XTJL. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QULL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.

Performance

QULL vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QULL achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly higher than XTJL's 5.36% return.

QULL

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 8.71%
• YTD: 14.81%
• 6M: 14.51%
• 1Y: 38.22%
• 3Y*: 32.28%
• 5Y*: 16.15%
• 10Y*: —

XTJL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 5.36%
• 6M: 6.38%
• 1Y: 15.64%
• 3Y*: 14.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QULL vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN	14.81%	17.61%	38.03%	57.07%	-42.00%	18.15%
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July	5.36%	15.42%	14.43%	25.72%	-15.66%	7.28%

Correlation

The correlation between QULL and XTJL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	0.92

The correlation between QULL and XTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QULL vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QULL

QULL Risk / Return Rank: 45
QULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
QULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
QULL Omega Ratio Rank: 42
QULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
QULL Martin Ratio Rank: 54

XTJL

XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 71
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QULL vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QULL	XTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	2.12	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	3.14	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.46	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	3.07	-0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.22	17.37	-8.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QULL vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QULL Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QULL and XTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QULL	XTJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	2.12	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.65	-0.09

Drawdowns

QULL vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QULL drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QULL and XTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	QULL	XTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.83%	-23.24%	-28.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.43%	-5.12%	-13.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.82%	-16.70%	-20.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	0.00%	-0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.06%	-4.04%	-10.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.15%	0.90%	+3.25%

Volatility

QULL vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.33%. This indicates that QULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QULL	XTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.68%	0.33%	+4.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.79%	5.72%	+13.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.46%	7.43%	+17.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.62%	15.22%	+20.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.15%	15.22%	+19.93%

QULL vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

QULL vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither QULL nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QULL and XTJL in my portfolio?

QULL and XTJL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QULL or XTJL?

QULL has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to XTJL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QULL dropped -51.83% vs XTJL's -23.24%.

Which ETF is better, QULL or XTJL?

On 3-year performance, QULL leads with 32.28% vs 14.68% for XTJL. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QULL or XTJL?

Over the 3-year period, QULL has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 14.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QULL or XTJL?

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QULL or XTJL?

QULL and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QULL and XTJL?

They also come from different issuers: UBS and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QULL and 0.79% for XTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.