QULL vs. URE
QULL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN) and URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) are both exchange-traded funds - QULL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while URE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QULL returned 15.94%/yr vs -4.32%/yr for URE. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
QULL vs. URE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QULL achieves a 13.30% return, which is significantly lower than URE's 16.38% return.
QULL
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 13.30%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 34.31%
- 3Y*
- 32.06%
- 5Y*
- 15.94%
- 10Y*
- —
URE
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 16.38%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 9.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- -4.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.98%
QULL vs. URE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN | 13.30% | 17.61% | 38.03% | 57.07% | -42.00% | 51.36% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 16.38% | -3.65% | 0.35% | 11.58% | -49.64% | 77.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between QULL and URE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2021 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QULL and URE has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QULL vs. URE — Risk / Return Rank
QULL
URE
QULL vs. URE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QULL | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.08 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 0.56 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.27 | 1.36 | +6.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QULL | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 0.34 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | -0.12 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | -0.06 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
QULL vs. URE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QULL drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, smaller than the maximum URE drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QULL and URE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QULL | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.83% | -97.16% | +45.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.43% | -16.50% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.82% | -33.77% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.83% | -63.66% | +11.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -51.68% | +49.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -64.51% | +50.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 6.84% | -2.68% |
Volatility
QULL vs. URE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) is 4.67%, while ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a volatility of 8.64%. This indicates that QULL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QULL | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 8.64% | -3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.88% | 19.97% | -1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.52% | 27.26% | -2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.62% | 37.35% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.12% | 40.57% | -5.45% |
QULL vs. URE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QULL and URE have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
QULL vs. URE - Dividend Comparison
QULL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 2.01% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 0.58% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QULL and URE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URE has higher volatility (8.64%) compared to QULL (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QULL dropped -51.83% vs URE's -97.16%.
On 5-year performance, QULL leads with 15.94% vs -4.32% for URE. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QULL has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QULL has performed better with a 15.94% return vs -4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QULL and URE have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
URE has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.00% for QULL.
QULL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while URE is REIT. QULL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: UBS and ProShares.
QULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QULL and URE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer