PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QULL vs. UGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QULL vs. UGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QULL achieves a 15.87% return, which is significantly lower than UGE's 18.88% return.


QULL

1D
0.83%
1M
4.92%
YTD
15.87%
6M
15.39%
1Y
36.85%
3Y*
31.62%
5Y*
16.17%
10Y*

UGE

1D
1.08%
1M
1.97%
YTD
18.88%
6M
15.24%
1Y
7.12%
3Y*
7.90%
5Y*
-1.08%
10Y*
8.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QULL vs. UGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QULL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN
15.87%17.61%38.03%57.07%-42.00%51.36%
UGE
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods
18.88%-5.21%16.40%2.38%-46.78%35.36%

Correlation

The correlation between QULL and UGE is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between QULL and UGE has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QULL vs. UGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QULL
QULL Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
QULL Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
QULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
QULL Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

UGE
UGE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QULL vs. UGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QULLUGEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.07

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

0.38

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

0.67

+8.26

QULL vs. UGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QULL Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the UGE Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QULL and UGE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QULL vs. UGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QULL drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, smaller than the maximum UGE drawdown of -71.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QULL and UGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QULLUGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.83%

-71.36%

+19.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.43%

-18.95%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.82%

-24.80%

-12.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.83%

-56.55%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-32.84%

+32.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.98%

-18.75%

+4.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

10.64%

-6.48%

Volatility

QULL vs. UGE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) is 5.66%, while ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that QULL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QULLUGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

8.67%

-3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.08%

20.01%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.65%

25.39%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.63%

31.37%

+4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.08%

33.11%

+1.97%

QULL vs. UGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QULL and UGE have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

QULL vs. UGE - Dividend Comparison

QULL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QULL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UGE
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods
2.05%2.54%1.43%1.20%0.74%0.20%0.41%0.86%0.76%0.68%0.76%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


QULL and UGE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGE has higher volatility (8.67%) compared to QULL (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QULL dropped -51.83% vs UGE's -71.36%.

On 5-year performance, QULL leads with 16.17% vs -1.08% for UGE. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QULL has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QULL has performed better with a 16.17% return vs -1.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QULL and UGE have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

UGE has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.00% for QULL.

QULL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while UGE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: UBS and ProShares.

QULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QULL and UGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer