QULL vs. MLPB
QULL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN) and MLPB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B) are both exchange-traded funds - QULL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while MLPB is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QULL returned 15.31%/yr vs 18.51%/yr for MLPB. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QULL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MLPB.
Performance
QULL vs. MLPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QULL achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly lower than MLPB's 17.00% return.
QULL
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 12.45%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 37.24%
- 3Y*
- 30.07%
- 5Y*
- 15.31%
- 10Y*
- —
MLPB
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -6.13%
- YTD
- 17.00%
- 6M
- 16.53%
- 1Y
- 18.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.94%
- 5Y*
- 18.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
QULL vs. MLPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN | 12.45% | 17.61% | 38.03% | 57.07% | -42.00% | 51.36% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 17.00% | 7.40% | 25.53% | 22.01% | 30.22% | 27.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between QULL and MLPB is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QULL and MLPB has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QULL vs. MLPB — Risk / Return Rank
QULL
MLPB
QULL vs. MLPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QULL | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.24 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 1.93 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.00 | 5.43 | +3.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QULL vs. MLPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QULL drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, smaller than the maximum MLPB drawdown of -71.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QULL and MLPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QULL | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.83% | -71.93% | +20.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.43% | -9.68% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.82% | -16.49% | -20.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.83% | -20.41% | -31.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.03% | -6.86% | +1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.93% | -14.78% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 3.44% | +0.71% |
Volatility
QULL vs. MLPB - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) at 5.33%. This indicates that QULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QULL | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.62% | 5.33% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.37% | 10.30% | +9.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.70% | 13.70% | +11.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.68% | 19.90% | +15.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.06% | 27.16% | +7.90% |
QULL vs. MLPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
QULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
QULL vs. MLPB - Dividend Comparison
QULL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 5.99% | 6.51% | 5.95% | 6.37% | 6.00% | 6.98% | 11.93% | 7.98% | 8.11% | 7.23% | 6.85% |
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QULL and MLPB have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QULL has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to MLPB (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QULL dropped -51.83% vs MLPB's -71.93%.
On 5-year performance, MLPB leads with 18.51% vs 15.31% for QULL. On fees, MLPB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, MLPB has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MLPB has performed better with a 18.51% return vs 15.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MLPB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QULL.
MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.99%, compared with 0.00% for QULL.
QULL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MLPB is MLPs. QULL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while MLPB tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QULL and 0.85% for MLPB.
QULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QULL and MLPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer