PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QULL vs. IFED
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QULL vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QULL vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QULL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN
-6.95%17.61%38.03%57.07%-42.00%9.87%
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
-10.58%15.02%23.04%20.78%-1.46%8.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QULL achieves a -6.95% return, which is significantly higher than IFED's -10.58% return.


QULL

1D
1.22%
1M
-11.66%
YTD
-6.95%
6M
-4.90%
1Y
20.02%
3Y*
26.76%
5Y*
13.82%
10Y*

IFED

1D
0.13%
1M
-5.40%
YTD
-10.58%
6M
-10.82%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QULL vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

QULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QULL vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QULL
QULL Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
QULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
QULL Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
QULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
QULL Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QULL vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QULLIFEDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.54

0.28

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.05

0.51

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.07

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

0.38

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.82

1.18

+2.64

QULL vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QULL Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the IFED Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QULL and IFED, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QULLIFEDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

0.28

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.58

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between QULL and IFED is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QULL vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

Neither QULL nor IFED has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QULL vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QULL drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QULL and IFED.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QULLIFEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.83%

-22.36%

-29.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.81%

-14.65%

-10.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.36%

-12.41%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.46%

-5.71%

-8.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.32%

4.70%

+0.62%

Volatility

QULL vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) has a higher volatility of 11.33% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 4.93%. This indicates that QULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QULLIFEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.33%

4.93%

+6.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.75%

10.82%

+8.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.54%

18.80%

+18.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.65%

19.71%

+15.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.49%

19.71%

+15.78%